Get your Frontiers in Genome Editing paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.1
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 11 August, 2026
Submitting to Frontiers in Genome Editing goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Frontiers in Genome Editing guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Frontiers in Genome Editing. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Frontiers in Genome Editing journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Frontiers in Genome Editing guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Frontiers in Genome Editing guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | Frontiers Genome Editing requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Structured abstract, no longer than a single paragraph, following the IMRAD format (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) or as required by the specific article type. No specific word limit is stated in the guidelines - the requirement is 'no longer than a single paragraph'. Abstracts should make the general significance and conceptual advance of the work clearly accessible to a broad readership. Minimize abbreviations and do not cite references, figures or tables. For clinical trial articles, include the unique identifier and URL of the trial registration website |
| Main text | Word count limits by article type: Original Research (12,000 words), Systematic Review (12,000 words), Methods (12,000 words), Review (12,000 words), Policy and Practice Reviews (12,000 words), Hypothesis and Theory (12,000 words), Mini Review (3,000 words, max 2 Figures/Tables), Perspective (3,000 words, max 2 Figures/Tables). Word count includes main body text, footnotes, and citations, but excludes abstract, section titles, figure/table captions, funding statement, acknowledgments, and references |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Minimum of 5 and maximum of 8 keywords required for all article types. Should use a mix of generic and more specific terms on the article subject(s) |
| References | Harvard (author-date) reference style. References should include the full last name and first name initials of the first six authors, followed by et al. and the year of publication in brackets. References are listed in alphabetical order. Authors must follow the Harvard referencing guidelines as specified in the Chicago Manual of Style |
| Peer review | Open/transparent peer review. The names of reviewers and editors appear on published articles. The peer review process is described as 'rigorous, transparent, and constructive' with a collaborative approach where authors and reviewers engage in direct online dialogue through Frontiers' interactive review forum |
| Submission | www.frontiersin.org/submission/submit?domainid=1&fieldid=130&specialtyid=0&entitytype=2&entityid=1540 |
Read the Frontiers in Genome Editing guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Frontiers in Genome Editing in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Frontiers Genome Editing papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Frontiers in Genome Editing journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Frontiers in Genome Editing guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.