Get your Frontiers in Aging paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.1
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 11 August, 2026
Submitting to Frontiers in Aging goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Frontiers in Aging guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Frontiers in Aging. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Frontiers in Aging journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Frontiers in Aging guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Frontiers in Aging guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | Frontiers Aging requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | The abstract should be no longer than a single paragraph and should be structured, for example, according to the IMRAD format (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion). For the specific structure of the abstract, authors should follow the requirements of the article type or journal to which they're submitting. No specific word limit is stated in the guidelines—only that it must be a single paragraph. Clinical trial articles must include the unique identifier and URL of the publicly accessible trial registration website |
| Main text | Word count limits by article type: Original Research: 12,000 words; Systematic Review: 12,000 words; Methods: 12,000 words; Review: 12,000 words; Hypothesis and Theory: 12,000 words; Clinical Trial: 12,000 words; Mini Review: 3,000 words; Perspective: 3,000 words; Case Report: 3,000 words; Data Report: 3,000 words; Brief Research Report: 4,000 words; Opinion: 2,000 words; General Commentary: 1,000 words. Manuscript length includes only the main body text, footnotes, and all citations within it, and excludes the abstract, section titles, figure and table captions, funding statement, acknowledgments, and references in the bibliography. For Original Research articles, the recommended section order is: Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Minimum of 5 and maximum of 8 keywords required for all article types |
| References | Harvard (author-date) reference style. Frontiers' journals use one of two reference styles, either Harvard (author-date) or Vancouver (numbered). Frontiers in Aging uses the Harvard (author-date) style. The names of the first six authors followed by et al. and the DOI (when available) should be provided. Given names of authors should be abbreviated to initials |
| Peer review | Single anonymized model (single-blind peer review). Frontiers operates a single anonymized model designed to guarantee a transparent and objective editorial and review process. During the independent review phase, reviewers assess manuscripts independently from each other and from the authors. When a manuscript is accepted for publication, the names of the reviewers who endorsed its publication appear on the published article |
| Submission | www.frontiersin.org/submission/submit?domainid=1&fieldid=135&specialtyid=0&entitytype=2&entityid=1566 |
Read the Frontiers in Aging guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Frontiers in Aging in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Frontiers Aging papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Frontiers in Aging journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Frontiers in Aging guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.