Get your Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.5
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 11 August, 2026
Submitting to Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | Frontiers Aging Neurosci requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Structured abstract required, no longer than a single paragraph, following IMRAD format (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion) or similar structure. No specific word limit stated in the guidelines; only requirement is that it be a single paragraph. Structure requirements may vary by article type. Minimize abbreviations and do not cite references, figures or tables. For clinical trials, must include trial identifier and registration URL |
| Main text | Word count limits vary by article type: Original Research, Systematic Review, Methods, Review, Hypothesis and Theory: 12,000 words maximum; Brief Research Report: 4,000 words maximum; Mini Review, Perspective, Data Report: 3,000 words maximum; Opinion: 2,000 words maximum; General Commentary: 1,000 words maximum; Editorial: 1,000 words for Topics with 5-10 articles (can be increased for larger Topics). Word count includes main body text, footnotes, and all citations, but excludes abstract, section titles, figure/table captions, funding statement, acknowledgments, and bibliography |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | 5-8 keywords recommended using a mix of generic and more specific terms on the article subject(s). The guidelines suggest using keywords in the title, maximum amount in first two sentences of abstract, and in level 1 headings for search engine optimization |
| References | Harvard (author-date) reference style. Citations should include the names of the first six authors followed by et al. and the DOI when available. Authors' given names should be abbreviated to initials. All citations in text, figures or tables must be in the reference list and vice-versa |
| Peer review | Single-blind/single-anonymous model. Frontiers operates a single anonymized model where reviewer identities are initially concealed from authors. When a manuscript is accepted for publication, the names of the reviewers who endorsed its publication appear on the published article, making the process transparent post-acceptance |
| Submission | www.frontiersin.org/submission/submit |
Read the Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Frontiers Aging Neurosci papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.