Get your Forum of Mathematics, Sigma paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.3
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 11 August, 2026
Submitting to Forum of Mathematics, Sigma goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Forum of Mathematics, Sigma guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Forum of Mathematics, Sigma. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Forum of Mathematics, Sigma journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Forum of Mathematics, Sigma guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Forum of Mathematics, Sigma guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | Forum Math Sigma requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Short abstract. The guide does not specify whether the abstract should be structured or unstructured, nor does it specify a word limit |
| Main text | Organize sections for the chosen article type; no single overall word limit is stated in the accessible guide |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Keywords are not requested. The journal requires '2020 Subject Classification codes (primary and secondary)' but does not mention keywords |
| References | References should be listed at the end of the paper and numbered in alphabetical order (by surname of the first author). References should be cited numerically in the text. Journal titles should be abbreviated as in Mathematical Reviews. Numbered citation style with alphabetical ordering |
| Peer review | Single-anonymized (single-blind). As stated on the review process page: 'The author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author.' |
| Submission | cup.msp.org/submit_new.php?j=sigma |
Read the Forum of Mathematics, Sigma guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Forum of Mathematics, Sigma in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Forum Math Sigma papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Forum of Mathematics, Sigma journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Forum of Mathematics, Sigma guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.