Food Quality and Preference Template
Get your Food Quality and Preference paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.2
How to Use the Food Quality and Preference Template | A Step-by-Step Guide
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 11 August, 2026
Submitting to Food Quality and Preference goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Food Quality and Preference guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
What is the Food Quality and Preference Template?
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Food Quality and Preference. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Food Quality and Preference journal page before you draft.
What's actually in a Food Quality Preference submission:
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Food Quality and Preference guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
What separates a clean submission from one that gets kicked back:
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Food Quality and Preference guide for authors before you submit.
What does this Food Quality and Preference Template include?
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through Editorial Manager.
Steps to Use This Template with SciSpace Agent
- Click Start Writing on this page. The SciSpace Agent prompt screen opens with the template loaded.
- Use the loaded template, or upload a version your group already uses for Food Quality Preference.
- Edit the prompt with your topic and article type, and note any requirement from the Food Quality and Preference guide for authors.
- Run the prompt. The agent drafts into the correct structure and reference style.
- Use View Outputs to verify required statements and formatting are present.
- Export and submit through Editorial Manager.
Food Quality and Preference Template Structure at a Glance
| Element | Food Quality Preference requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Abstract must not exceed 250 words. Should be concise and factual, briefly stating the purpose of research, principal results and major conclusions. Must be able to stand alone. Avoid references (if essential, cite author(s) and year(s)). Avoid non-standard or uncommon abbreviations (if essential, define at first mention). A structured abstract option is also available, using appropriate headings to provide context/background, state purpose, outline basic procedures (selection of study subjects/laboratory animals, observational and analytical methods), include main findings with specific effect sizes and statistical significance if possible, principal conclusions, and emphasize new and important aspects |
| Main text | Full-length articles: not to exceed 7,000 words (excluding references, tables, figure headings). Review articles: not to exceed 10,000 words (excluding references, tables, figure headings). Short/rapid communications: not to exceed 4,000 words (about 8 manuscript pages, including figures, tables and no more than 20 references) |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | 1 to 6 keywords required for indexing purposes. Keywords should be written in English. Try to avoid keywords consisting of multiple words (using 'and' or 'of'). Only use abbreviations in keywords if they are firmly established in the field |
| References | APA style (American Psychological Association, 7th Edition, 2020). Author-date citation style. Reference list arranged alphabetically and then chronologically. Multiple references from same author(s) in same year identified by letters 'a', 'b', 'c', etc. after year of publication |
| Peer review | Single anonymized review (single-blind). Submission initially assessed by editors for suitability, then typically sent to minimum of two reviewers for independent expert assessment of scientific quality. Editors make final acceptance/rejection decision |
| Submission | www.editorialmanager.com/FQAP/default.aspx |
Quick Tips for Using the Food Quality and Preference Template
Read the Food Quality and Preference guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Food Quality and Preference in under a page.
Best Practices
Skim two or three recent Food Quality Preference papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Food Quality and Preference journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Before You Submit: Final Check
Do one focused pass against the Food Quality and Preference guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through Editorial Manager.
