Get your Food Innovation and Advances paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.5
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 11 August, 2026
Submitting to Food Innovation and Advances goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Food Innovation and Advances guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Food Innovation and Advances. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Food Innovation and Advances journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Food Innovation and Advances guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Food Innovation and Advances guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through ScholarOne (Manuscript Central).
| Element | Food Innovation Advances requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | For Research Articles and Reviews: Limited to 250 words, unstructured (should not be structured), without abbreviations or references. Should state background and purpose of research, methods (or rationale), main results and findings, and brief conclusions. For Mini Reviews: Limited to 120 words. For Perspectives: Not relevant (no abstract required) |
| Main text | Word limits provided for guidance only (editors may consider submissions exceeding limits subject to peer review feedback). Research Articles: Limited to 6,500 words excluding abstract, references, tables, figures, and legends. Reviews: Limited to 6,000 words excluding abstract, references, figures and tables. Perspectives: Limited to 3,000 words excluding abstract, references and figure legends. Mini Reviews: Limited to 2,500 words excluding abstract, references and figure legends. Standard section order for Articles: Introduction, Materials and methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusions, Electronic supplementary information, Author contributions, Acknowledgments, Ethical statement (optional), Conflict of interest, Data availability, References |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | For Research Articles, Reviews, and Mini Reviews: Maximum of 6 keywords required. Should avoid general and plural terms and multiple concepts (avoid 'and', 'of'). Only abbreviations firmly established in the field are eligible. For Perspectives: Not relevant (no keywords required) |
| References | Numbered references in square brackets without periods. Listed numerically in order of citation. Format: Author(s) surname and initials without periods, year followed by period, article/chapter title, journal title (full spelling) or book title, volume number with colon and inclusive page numbers. List first five authors then 'et al.' if six or more authors; list all if five or fewer. One citation per reference number; multiple references in one place separated by commas with space |
| Peer review | Single-blind peer review (confirmed by Maximum Academic Press policy stating 'All MAP journals execute a single-blind peer review process') |
| Submission | mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/fia |
Read the Food Innovation and Advances guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Food Innovation and Advances in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Food Innovation Advances papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Food Innovation and Advances journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Food Innovation and Advances guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through ScholarOne (Manuscript Central).