Get your Expert Review of Gastroenterology and Hepatology paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 11 August, 2026
Submitting to Expert Review of Gastroenterology and Hepatology goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Expert Review of Gastroenterology and Hepatology guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Expert Review of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Expert Review of Gastroenterology and Hepatology journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Expert Review of Gastroenterology and Hepatology guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Expert Review of Gastroenterology and Hepatology guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | Expert Rev Gastroenterology Hepatol requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Structured abstract, maximum 200 words. For Review articles: headings are Introduction (significance of topic), Areas covered (research discussed and literature search), and Expert opinion (summary of Expert Opinion section). For Original Research articles: headings are Background, Research design and methods (including Main outcome measures), Results, Conclusions, and Trial Registration (if applicable). For Special Reports: same structure as Review articles. References must not be included in abstracts |
| Main text | Review articles: maximum 7000 words for body of article, with Expert Opinion section minimum 500 words. Special Reports: 1500-3000 words excluding figures, tables, and references, with Expert Opinion section 500-1000 words (included in overall count). Guideline Comparison (Special Report): 2000 words total excluding figures, tables, and references, with Expert Opinion approximately 500 words (included in 2000-word limit). Original Research articles: no word limit specified in guidelines |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Review articles: 4-10 keywords in alphabetical order. Original Research articles: 4-6 keywords in alphabetical order. Special Reports: keywords in alphabetical order (specific count not stated). Guideline Comparison articles: 5-8 keywords in alphabetical order |
| References | Taylor & Francis NLM (National Library of Medicine) style. Reference guide available at https://files.taylorandfrancis.com/tf_nlm.pdf. EndNote output style also available. Important references should be highlighted with one or two asterisk symbols (* = of interest, ** = of considerable interest) with brief annotations. Review articles: around 100 references suggested. Special Reports: maximum 100 references suggested. Original Research: no specific limit stated |
| Peer review | Double-blind peer review (also referred to as double-anonymous peer review). Once papers are assessed for suitability by the editor, they are reviewed by at least two independent, anonymous expert referees |
| Submission | rp.tandfonline.com/submission/create?journalCode=IERH |
Read the Expert Review of Gastroenterology and Hepatology guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Expert Review of Gastroenterology and Hepatology in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Expert Rev Gastroenterology Hepatol papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Expert Review of Gastroenterology and Hepatology journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Expert Review of Gastroenterology and Hepatology guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.