Get your Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.6
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 11 August, 2026
Submitting to Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | Expert Opinion on Biol Ther requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Structured abstract of no more than 200 words. Requirements vary by article type: (1) Review Articles - Headings: Introduction (describe significance of topic), Areas covered (research discussed and literature search), Expert opinion (summary of expert opinion section). (2) Original Research - Suggested headings: Background (reason for study), Research design and methods (study population/setting, blinding, comparators, dosage, treatment regimens/durations, efficacy/safety), Main outcome measures, Results (efficacy and adverse events), Conclusions (qualified by key limitations), Trial Registration (if clinical trial). (3) Drug Evaluation and other article types - Headings: Introduction, Areas covered, Expert opinion. References must not be included in the abstract |
| Main text | Review Articles: Maximum 7000 words, with Expert Opinion section minimum 500 words. Drug Evaluation: 3000 words maximum (not including tables, figures, and references); up to 5 figures and 5 tables permitted. Original Research: No word limit stated. General limit: maximum of 5 tables |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | 5-8 keywords required (per main instructions). Specific requirements by article type: Review Articles: 4-10 keywords in alphabetical order; Original Research: 4-6 keywords in alphabetical order; Drug Evaluation: brief list of keywords in alphabetical order |
| References | NLM style (National Library of Medicine / Vancouver style). Important references should be highlighted with one/two asterisk system (* = of interest, ** = of considerable interest) and annotated with brief sentence explaining why. Drug Evaluations: maximum 100 references suggested |
| Peer review | Double-anonymous (double-blind) peer review by at least two independent, anonymous expert referees. For Drug Evaluations, manuscript is also sent to the company responsible for marketing/developing the drug for technical accuracy check only (not for editorial decision) |
| Submission | rp.tandfonline.com/submission/create?journalCode=IEBT |
Read the Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Expert Opinion on Biol Ther papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.