Get your Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 11 August, 2026
Submitting to Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through Editorial Manager.
| Element | Exercise Sport Sci Rev requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Abstract limited to 40 to 60 words, unstructured, emphasizing the novel hypothesis. Abbreviations must be defined at first use. No specific requirements differ by article type, though Perspectives for Progress articles must emphasize key gaps in knowledge rather than a hypothesis |
| Main text | Approximately 40,000 to 46,000 characters (including spaces), which includes abstract, text, references, tables, figures, and legends. This translates to 6-8 printed journal pages. No more than 7 tables and figures total recommended. If fewer than 4 figures/tables are used, character count can go up to 46,000; if more than 4 figures/tables are used, limit text character count to 40,000 |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | 5 to 7 keywords required |
| References | National Library of Medicine (NLM) standard / Index Medicus format. Brief review articles limited to approximately 50 references at initial submission (revised manuscripts may include additional references as necessary). Perspectives for Progress articles may use up to 150 references |
| Peer review | Single-blind review. The guidelines explicitly state: 'Reviewers will know the identity of the author.' At least two reviewers are chosen by the Associate Editor |
| Submission | editorialmanager.com/essr |
Read the Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Exercise Sport Sci Rev papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through Editorial Manager.