Get your European Sociological Review paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.2
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 11 August, 2026
Submitting to European Sociological Review goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the European Sociological Review guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to European Sociological Review. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the European Sociological Review journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the European Sociological Review guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the European Sociological Review guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through ScholarOne (Manuscript Central).
| Element | European Sociol Rev requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Not more than 200 words. No specific structure (unstructured abstract) or mandatory headings mentioned by article type |
| Main text | Original research articles: Usually around 8,000 words (including endnotes and references, but excluding tables and figures). Articles exceeding 8,000 words may be considered if the contribution justifies the length. Data Briefs: Standard article length (approximately 8,000 words). Comments and Replies: No specific word limit stated |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Keywords are required upon submission. The official guide does not specify a count or range |
| References | Harvard-style (author-date) in-text citations, e.g., (Gans, 1962). References listed alphabetically. Format examples: Author, A. B. (Year). Title. Journal, Volume, Pages |
| Peer review | Double-blind peer review (stated explicitly: 'Articles will be subject to a double-blind peer review process') |
| Submission | mc.manuscriptcentral.com/esr/ |
Read the European Sociological Review guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to European Sociological Review in under a page.
Skim two or three recent European Sociol Rev papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the European Sociological Review journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the European Sociological Review guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through ScholarOne (Manuscript Central).