Get your European Review of Social Psychology paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.7
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 11 August, 2026
Submitting to European Review of Social Psychology goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the European Review of Social Psychology guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to European Review of Social Psychology. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the European Review of Social Psychology journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the European Review of Social Psychology guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the European Review of Social Psychology guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | European Rev Soc Psychol requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Unstructured abstract of 150 words |
| Main text | 50 pages maximum (including references, but not counting tables or figures) |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Keywords are mentioned in the structure section (manuscripts should include 'title page; abstract; keywords; main text...') but no specific count, range, or format requirements are stated in the official guide |
| References | Any consistent scholarly citation format at initial submission (format-free submission policy); the journal reference style will be applied post-acceptance by Taylor & Francis. References can be in any style or format so long as a consistent scholarly citation format is applied |
| Peer review | Single-blind peer review (reviewers know author identity, but authors do not know reviewer identities, as stated: 'it will then be single blind peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees') |
| Submission | rp.tandfonline.com/submission/create?journalCode=PERS |
Read the European Review of Social Psychology guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to European Review of Social Psychology in under a page.
Skim two or three recent European Rev Soc Psychol papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the European Review of Social Psychology journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the European Review of Social Psychology guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.