Get your European Journal of Clinical Nutrition paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.2
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 11 August, 2026
Submitting to European Journal of Clinical Nutrition goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | European J Clin Nutr requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Article: Structured abstract with mandatory headings (Background/Objectives; Subjects/Methods; Results; Conclusion), max. 250 words. Review Article: Unstructured abstract max. 250 words. Mini Review: Unstructured abstract max. 200 words. Case Report: Unstructured abstract max. 150 words. Brief Communication: Unstructured abstract max. 150 words. Correspondence, Comment, Perspective, Editorial: No abstract required |
| Main text | Article: Main body (excluding abstract, tables/figures, references) max. 3,000 words; max. 6 tables or figures; max. 50 references. Review Article: max. 5,000 words; max. 8 tables or figures; max. 100 references. Mini Review: max. 3,000 words; max. 6 tables/figures; max. 50 references. Case Report and Brief Communication: max. 1,000 words; max. 2 tables or figures; max. 10 references. Correspondence and Comment: max. 750-1,000 words; max. 2 tables or figures; max. 10 references. Perspective: max. 2,000 words; max. 4 tables/figures; max. 25 references. Editorial: max. 1,000 words; max. 2 tables/figures; max. 5 references |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Subject terms from Nature subject ontology required: authors must select 1 to 4 unique subject terms that describe the key subjects and concepts in their manuscript. These are not traditional keywords but rather standardized subject classifications |
| References | Vancouver format. References numbered starting at one in order of citation in text. All authors listed for papers with up to 6 authors; for papers with more than 6 authors, list first 6 followed by et al. Abbreviations for journal titles follow Index Medicus. First and last page numbers required. Personal communications can be included in reference list with permission from individual concerned |
| Peer review | Single anonymized (single-blind). The journal uses an anonymous peer review process where reviewer identities are kept confidential from authors. Editors, authors, and reviewers are required to keep details confidential, and reviewers are asked not to identify themselves to authors |
| Submission | mts-ejcn.nature.com/cgi-bin/main.plex |
Read the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to European Journal of Clinical Nutrition in under a page.
Skim two or three recent European J Clin Nutr papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.