Get your European Journal for Philosophy of Science paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.1
Anna Alexandrova
Simon Lohse
Sabina Leonelli
Alisa Bokulich
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 8 September, 2026
Submitting to European Journal for Philosophy of Science goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the European Journal for Philosophy of Science guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to European Journal for Philosophy of Science. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the European Journal for Philosophy of Science journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the European Journal for Philosophy of Science guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the European Journal for Philosophy of Science guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through Editorial Manager.
| Element | European Journal for Philosophy of Sc… requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | A unstructured abstract of no more than 250 words |
| Main text | Organize sections for the chosen article type; no single overall word limit is stated in the accessible guide |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | 4–6 keywords |
| References | Citation style not stated in the accessible author guidelines; match recent articles and any editor instructions |
| Peer review | double-anonymous (double-blind) peer review |
| Submission | www.editorialmanager.com/epsa/ |
Read the European Journal for Philosophy of Science guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to European Journal for Philosophy of Science in under a page.
Skim two or three recent European Journal for Philosophy of Sc… papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the European Journal for Philosophy of Science journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the European Journal for Philosophy of Science guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through Editorial Manager.