Get your Epidemiologic Reviews paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.9
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 11 August, 2026
Submitting to Epidemiologic Reviews goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Epidemiologic Reviews guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Epidemiologic Reviews. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Epidemiologic Reviews journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Epidemiologic Reviews guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Epidemiologic Reviews guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through ScholarOne (Manuscript Central).
| Element | Epidemiologic Rev requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Unstructured abstract (1 double-spaced paragraph). Should state concisely the research question, methods used, results, and the answer to the research question. Maximum 250 words. Required for all reviews |
| Main text | Reviews: maximum 6,000 words (exclusive of tables, figures, references, and abstract). Commentaries: maximum 4,500 words |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Not more than 8 MeSH headings in alphabetical order, selected from main headings listed in Medical Subject Headings in Index Medicus |
| References | AMA Manual of Style, 11th Edition. Number references consecutively in order of mention. Reference numbers are superscript and placed after the text. For >3 authors, list first 3 and add et al |
| Peer review | Double-anonymized (double-blind): identities of authors are hidden from reviewers, and reviewers' identities are hidden from authors. Typically sent to 2 reviewers |
| Submission | mc.manuscriptcentral.com/aje |
Read the Epidemiologic Reviews guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Epidemiologic Reviews in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Epidemiologic Rev papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Epidemiologic Reviews journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Epidemiologic Reviews guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through ScholarOne (Manuscript Central).