Get your Emerging Contaminants paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 10 August, 2026
Submitting to Emerging Contaminants goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Emerging Contaminants guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Emerging Contaminants. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Emerging Contaminants journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Emerging Contaminants guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Emerging Contaminants guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through Editorial Manager.
| Element | Emerging Contaminants requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Structured abstract required for Full-length/Research Articles. Abstract must not exceed 250 words. Structured abstract should include: context/background, purpose, basic procedures (study subject selection, methods), main findings with specific effect sizes and statistical significance if possible, principal conclusions. Should emphasize new and important aspects. For Review Articles, Mini Reviews, and other article types: specific structured requirements not stated in guide, but 250-word limit appears to apply generally |
| Main text | Full-length/Research Article: No overall word limit stated. Required structure: Introduction, Material and methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusions, Authors' contribution, Ethic statement, COI, Bibliography, Appendices. Review Article: No word limit stated. Should include table of contents, extensive up-to-date bibliography. No unpublished material permitted. Mini Review: No word limit stated. Short Communication: No word limit stated. For rapid dissemination of significant results. Perspective: Should not normally exceed 3,000 words, up to 30 references, no more than 4 display items (figures, tables, boxes). Editorial: No word limit stated |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | 1 to 7 keywords required for indexing purposes. Keywords should be written in English. Authors should avoid keywords consisting of multiple words (using 'and' or 'of'). Abbreviations only if firmly established in the field |
| References | Numbered reference style. References indicated by number within square brackets in text, numbered in order of appearance. Journal names abbreviated according to List of Title Word Abbreviations (LTWA). At submission, references can be in any style or format as long as consistent (author names, journal/book titles, year, volume, pagination must be included). Journal reference style will be applied after acceptance at proof stage |
| Peer review | Single anonymized review process (single-blind). Submission assessed by editors for suitability, then typically sent to minimum of two reviewers for independent expert assessment. Editorial decision is final |
| Submission | www.editorialmanager.com/emcon/default.aspx |
Read the Emerging Contaminants guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Emerging Contaminants in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Emerging Contaminants papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Emerging Contaminants journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Emerging Contaminants guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through Editorial Manager.