Get your eGastroenterology paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.8
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 10 August, 2026
Submitting to eGastroenterology goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the eGastroenterology guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to eGastroenterology. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the eGastroenterology journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the eGastroenterology guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the eGastroenterology guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through ScholarOne (Manuscript Central).
| Element | eGastroenterology requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Original Research: Structured abstract up to 350 words with mandatory subtitles: Background, Methods, Results, and Conclusion. Must include a 'key messages' section (3-5 sentences) with headings: 'What is already known on this topic', 'What this study adds', and 'How this study might affect research, practice or policy'. Visual abstract mandatory for revised manuscripts. Review: Up to 350 words (unstructured). Research Letter: No abstract. Editorial: No abstract. Perspective: No abstract. Guideline: Not specified |
| Main text | Original Research: Up to 5,000 words (excludes title page, abstract, tables, acknowledgements, contributions and references). Review: Up to 5,500 words (up to 6,000 by request to editorial office). Research Letter: Up to 1,200 words (includes title page, main text, references, and figure legend or table; excludes funding support section). Guideline: Up to 4,000 words. Editorial: Up to 1,500 words. Perspective: Up to 1,200 words (includes title page, main text, references, and figure legend or table; excludes funding support section) |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) descriptors required as keywords to optimize discoverability. No specific count mentioned in the official guidelines, though published articles show varying numbers (e.g., 1-5 keywords observed) |
| References | Vancouver style. References must be sequentially numbered in the text using square brackets or superscripts and listed numerically in the reference list. first three authors by last name and initials, followed by 'et al' if applicable. Include article title and DOI or PubMed ID. Maximum: Original Research and Review up to 100 references; Research Letter and Perspective up to 6; Editorial up to 9 |
| Peer review | Open peer review. The journal operates open peer review; upon publication, all previous versions of the manuscript are made available, as are the reviewers' comments and authors' replies to those comments |
| Submission | mc.manuscriptcentral.com/egastroenterology |
Read the eGastroenterology guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to eGastroenterology in under a page.
Skim two or three recent eGastroenterology papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the eGastroenterology journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the eGastroenterology guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through ScholarOne (Manuscript Central).