Get your Educational Technology and Society paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.6
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 10 August, 2026
Submitting to Educational Technology and Society goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Educational Technology and Society guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Educational Technology and Society. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Educational Technology and Society journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Educational Technology and Society guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Educational Technology and Society guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | Educ Technology Soc requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Unstructured abstract with a 250-word limit. No mandatory headings specified. The requirement applies uniformly across article types; no differentiation by article type is stated in the guide |
| Main text | Less than 8,000 words (inclusive of a 250-word abstract, 4 to 5 keywords, figure captions, and tables), excluding References and Appendices. Endnotes and footnotes are not accepted. No specific section order or limits stated by article type; authors must use the ET&S template for manuscript preparation |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | 4 to 5 keywords required |
| References | APA 7th edition format. The guide states: 'Please ensure the references and citations comply to APA format 7th edition.' |
| Peer review | Double-blind peer review. The guide states: 'Submissions that meet the aims and scope of ET&S are then sent out for double-blind peer review by at least two international reviewers with expertise in the field.' |
| Submission | www.j-ets.net/submit |
Read the Educational Technology and Society guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Educational Technology and Society in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Educ Technology Soc papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Educational Technology and Society journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Educational Technology and Society guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.