Get your Economics of Education Review paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 10 August, 2026
Submitting to Economics of Education Review goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Economics of Education Review guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Economics of Education Review. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Economics of Education Review journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Economics of Education Review guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Economics of Education Review guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | Econ Educ Rev requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Unstructured abstract required, maximum 250 words. The abstract should briefly state the purpose of the research, principal results and major conclusions. Must be able to stand alone; avoid references unless essential (with author(s) and year(s) if included); avoid non-standard or uncommon abbreviations (define if essential). No differentiation by article type specified |
| Main text | Regular articles: No word/page limit explicitly stated in guide. Short Communications: Maximum 6,000 words with at most 5 exhibits (tables or figures); online appendices up to 20 pages permitted but manuscripts must be self-contained. Replication Studies: No length requirements. Expedited review available for manuscripts of any length and format |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Required: 1 to 7 keywords for indexing purposes. Should be written in English. Avoid keywords consisting of multiple words (using 'and' or 'of'). Only use abbreviations if firmly established in the field |
| References | APA (American Psychological Association) 7th Edition (2020). Citations in text follow APA referencing style. Reference list arranged alphabetically and then chronologically. Note: At submission, references can be in any style as long as consistent; journal reference style applied at proof stage after acceptance |
| Peer review | Single-blind (single anonymized review process). Submission initially assessed by editors for suitability, then typically sent to a minimum of two reviewers for independent expert assessment of scientific quality |
| Submission | submit.elsevier.com/ECOEDU |
Read the Economics of Education Review guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Economics of Education Review in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Econ Educ Rev papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Economics of Education Review journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Economics of Education Review guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.