Get your Digestive Diseases and Sciences paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.6
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 10 August, 2026
Submitting to Digestive Diseases and Sciences goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Digestive Diseases and Sciences guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Digestive Diseases and Sciences. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Digestive Diseases and Sciences journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Digestive Diseases and Sciences guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Digestive Diseases and Sciences guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | Digestive Dis Sci requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Structured abstract required. For Title Page section (general guideline): 150 to 250 words, divided into Purpose (stating main purposes and research question), Methods, Results, Conclusion. For Original Articles specifically: Structured abstract of no more than 250 words organized into Background, Aims, Methods, Results, and Conclusions. Abbreviations, footnotes, and references should not be used in abstract except for standard, repetitive abbreviations (HCV, GERD, etc.). For Reviews: General abstract of no more than 250 words (not specified if structured or unstructured). For prospectively registered trials, include trial registration number and date; for retrospectively registered trials, note 'retrospectively registered' |
| Main text | No maximum for word count, figures, tables, or references for Original Articles and Reviews. Manuscripts should follow order: Title Page, Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, References, Tables, Figure Legends, and Figures |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | 4 to 6 keywords for indexing purposes |
| References | Numbered citation style (Vancouver-style). Reference citations in text identified by numbers in square brackets [1], [2], [3], [1-3, 7]. Reference list entries numbered consecutively. Format includes author names (all authors ideally provided, or use 'et al' for long lists), year, title, journal name (using ISSN standard abbreviations), volume:pages, and DOI as full DOI links when available. Examples: journal articles, books, book chapters, online documents, dissertations all specified with distinct formatting requirements |
| Peer review | - The official submission guidelines do not explicitly state the peer review model (single-blind, double-blind, open, etc.). The guidelines mention that 'submitted manuscripts are reviewed by the editor-in-chief and associate editors and, in the majority of cases, by two or more experts in the field' but do not specify the anonymization approach. The guidelines reference double-anonymous peer review conditionally ('If the journal that you are submitting to uses double-anonymous peer review...'), indicating this varies by Springer journal, but DDS-specific policy is not stated |
| Submission | submission.springernature.com/new-submission/10620/3 |
Read the Digestive Diseases and Sciences guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Digestive Diseases and Sciences in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Digestive Dis Sci papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Digestive Diseases and Sciences journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Digestive Diseases and Sciences guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.