Current Opinion in Critical Care Template
Get your Current Opinion in Critical Care paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4
How to Use the Current Opinion in Critical Care Template | A Step-by-Step Guide
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 7 August, 2026
Submitting to Current Opinion in Critical Care goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Current Opinion in Critical Care guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
What is the Current Opinion in Critical Care Template?
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Current Opinion in Critical Care. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Current Opinion in Critical Care journal page before you draft.
What's actually in a Current Opinion Crit Care submission:
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Current Opinion in Critical Care guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
What separates a clean submission from one that gets kicked back:
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Current Opinion in Critical Care guide for authors before you submit.
What does this Current Opinion in Critical Care Template include?
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through Editorial Manager.
Steps to Use This Template with SciSpace Agent
- Click Start Writing on this page. The SciSpace Agent prompt screen opens with the template loaded.
- Use the loaded template, or upload a version your group already uses for Current Opinion Crit Care.
- Edit the prompt with your topic and article type, and note any requirement from the Current Opinion in Critical Care guide for authors.
- Run the prompt. The agent drafts into the correct structure and reference style.
- Use View Outputs to verify required statements and formatting are present.
- Export and submit through Editorial Manager.
Current Opinion in Critical Care Template Structure at a Glance
| Element | Current Opinion Crit Care requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Structured abstract required with three labeled paragraphs, maximum 200 words total. Must include: (1) Purpose of review: describe why this review is timely and relevant; (2) Recent findings: describe the main themes in the literature covered by the article; (3) Summary: describe the implications of the findings for clinical practice or research. 3-5 keywords or phrases must also be listed |
| Main text | Review must be approximately 2500 words in length (excluding references). Must include: introduction, text subdivided by headings (with at least one sentence dividing two headings), and conclusion. The review should highlight and discuss all interesting developments in the subject, with particular emphasis on articles published during the review period |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | 3-5 keywords or phrases required |
| References | Vancouver style (numbered). References must be in numerical sequence and include the first three authors, or all authors if there are four or fewer. Approximately 75-80% of references from the period reviewed must be bulleted (one asterisk for special interest, two asterisks for outstanding interest) and annotated with a brief description of the paper's importance. At least 80% of references should be from the review period |
| Peer review | Peer reviewed; blind model not specified in the official author guidelines |
| Submission | www.editorialmanager.com/cocc/default.aspx |
Quick Tips for Using the Current Opinion in Critical Care Template
Read the Current Opinion in Critical Care guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Current Opinion in Critical Care in under a page.
Best Practices
Skim two or three recent Current Opinion Crit Care papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Current Opinion in Critical Care journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Before You Submit: Final Check
Do one focused pass against the Current Opinion in Critical Care guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through Editorial Manager.
