Critical Finance Review Template
Get your Critical Finance Review paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4
How to Use the Critical Finance Review Template | A Step-by-Step Guide
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 7 August, 2026
Submitting to Critical Finance Review goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Critical Finance Review guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
What is the Critical Finance Review Template?
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Critical Finance Review. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Critical Finance Review journal page before you draft.
What's actually in a Crit Finance Rev submission:
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Critical Finance Review guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
What separates a clean submission from one that gets kicked back:
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Critical Finance Review guide for authors before you submit.
What does this Critical Finance Review Template include?
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
Steps to Use This Template with SciSpace Agent
- Click Start Writing on this page. The SciSpace Agent prompt screen opens with the template loaded.
- Use the loaded template, or upload a version your group already uses for Crit Finance Rev.
- Edit the prompt with your topic and article type, and note any requirement from the Critical Finance Review guide for authors.
- Run the prompt. The agent drafts into the correct structure and reference style.
- Use View Outputs to verify required statements and formatting are present.
- Export and submit through the journal's submission system.
Critical Finance Review Template Structure at a Glance
| Element | Crit Finance Rev requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Not more than 150 words. No specific mention of structured vs. unstructured format or mandatory headings. This abstract requirement applies to accepted manuscripts and appears in various online and printed abstract journals |
| Main text | Organize sections for the chosen article type; no single overall word limit is stated in the accessible guide |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Not specified in the official author guidelines |
| References | References should be integrated as citations in text rather than footnotes whenever possible. First names of authors should be included when first mentioned. Citations should include page numbers for quoted material. Reference list should be alphabetical by author's last name then by year, with all authors listed (avoid using et al.). For unpublished articles, authors must provide internet links and make the article available on the web before publication. Example citation format provided: 'Allan Gibbard (1973) and Mark Satterthwaite (1975) independently asked the question of what happens when the agents studied by Kenneth Arrow in Social Choice and Individual Values (1963) decided...' This appears to be a variation of author-date style |
| Peer review | Single-blind peer review. Referees remain anonymous while providing objective assessments of correctness and helping improve papers. The editor determines if the submission is a good fit or sufficiently interesting. For submissions through the editorial express system, manuscripts are transmitted to referees with identifying features and internal document metadata automatically cleansed |
| Submission | editorialexpress.com/cfr |
Quick Tips for Using the Critical Finance Review Template
Read the Critical Finance Review guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Critical Finance Review in under a page.
Best Practices
Skim two or three recent Crit Finance Rev papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Critical Finance Review journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Before You Submit: Final Check
Do one focused pass against the Critical Finance Review guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.
