Get your Common Market Law Review paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.8
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 7 August, 2026
Submitting to Common Market Law Review goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Common Market Law Review guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Common Market Law Review. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Common Market Law Review journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Common Market Law Review guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Common Market Law Review guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's editorial office.
| Element | Common Market Law Rev requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Articles: Around 150 words, unstructured. Case annotations: Around 150 words with structured format required - Introduction, Factual (and legal) background, Opinion of the Advocate General (as required), Judgment of the Court, Analysis/Comment, Conclusion |
| Main text | Articles: Preferably 12,000-15,000 words including footnotes. Case annotations: Around 8,000 words including footnotes. Book reviews: Up to 2,000 words with no footnotes allowed. Section order for case annotations: Introduction, Factual (and legal) background, Opinion of the Advocate General (as required), Judgment of the Court, Analysis/Comment, Conclusion |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Required; must be listed and should include the jurisdiction or organization commented on, where applicable. No specific count or range specified |
| References | OSCOLA 5th edition. Footnotes must be numbered in sequential order as cited in the text. The first footnote containing the author's affiliation must be marked with an asterisk (*) |
| Peer review | Double-blind peer review (also referred to as double-anonymous). Manuscripts accepted for peer review undergo double blind peer review by the Editorial Board |
| Submission | Email: CMLRev@law.leidenuniv.nl |
Read the Common Market Law Review guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Common Market Law Review in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Common Market Law Rev papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Common Market Law Review journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Common Market Law Review guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's editorial office.