Get your Clinical Kidney Journal paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.7
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 7 August, 2026
Submitting to Clinical Kidney Journal goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Clinical Kidney Journal guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Clinical Kidney Journal. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Clinical Kidney Journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Clinical Kidney Journal guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Clinical Kidney Journal guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through ScholarOne (Manuscript Central).
| Element | Clin Kidney J requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Structured abstract required for most article types with the following requirements: - Original articles: Up to 250 words. Structured with four sections: 'Background', 'Methods', 'Results', and 'Conclusions'. - CKJ Reviews: Up to 250 words (structure not specified). - Exceptional case: Up to 100 words (structure not specified). - Pro/Con debate: Maximum 100 words for each contender. - Editorial comment: No abstract required. - Letter to the editor: No abstract required |
| Main text | Word limits and structure vary by article type: - Original articles: Maximum 3000 words (excluding abstract and references). Structure: Title page, 250-word abstract, 3 key learning points, maximum 5 keywords, Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, Acknowledgements, References, Tables, Legends to figures and Figures. - CKJ Reviews: Maximum 4000 words (excluding abstract up to 250 words and references). At least 4 figures or tables. Maximum 10 authors. - Exceptional case: Maximum 750 words. Structure: Title page, 100-word abstract, maximum 5 keywords, Background, Case Report(s), Discussion, Patient Consent, Acknowledgements, References, Tables, Legends to figures and Figures. - Pro/Con debate: 1500 words per contender. Includes moderator-written introduction, plus "A Conclusion and a Perspective should be included in the opposing views." - Editorial comment: Maximum 1500 words. - Letter to the editor: 600 words, 5 references, 1 figure or 1 table. Formatted in one continuous section |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Maximum 5 keywords required for most article types: - Original articles: Maximum 5 keywords in alphabetical order, characterizing the scope of the paper, the principal materials, and main subject of work. - CKJ Reviews: Maximum 5 keywords. - Exceptional case: Maximum 5 keywords in alphabetical order, characterizing the case. - Pro/Con debate: Not specified. - Editorial comment: Not specified. - Letter to the editor: No keywords required |
| References | Numbered citation style following Oxford SCIMED style. References should be numbered in the order in which they appear in the text. The full list of references should give the name and initials of all authors unless there are more than six, when only the first three should be given followed by et al. The authors' names should be followed by the title of the article, the title of the journal abbreviated according to the style of Index Medicus, the year of publication, the volume number and the first and last page numbers. References to published abstracts should be mentioned in the text but not in the reference list |
| Peer review | Single-anonymized (single-blind) peer review. The journal operates single-anonymized peer review, meaning that the identity of the authors is known to the editors and to the reviewers, but that the reviewers' identities are known only to the editors and are hidden from the authors |
| Submission | mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ckj |
Read the Clinical Kidney Journal guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Clinical Kidney Journal in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Clin Kidney J papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Clinical Kidney Journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Clinical Kidney Journal guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through ScholarOne (Manuscript Central).