Get your Cell Genomics paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.1
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 3 August, 2026
Submitting to Cell Genomics goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Cell Genomics guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Cell Genomics. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Cell Genomics journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Cell Genomics guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Cell Genomics guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through Editorial Manager.
| Element | Cell Genomics requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Unstructured. The Summary is a single paragraph no longer than 150 words. Must include: (1) a brief background of the question that avoids statements about how a process is not well understood; (2) a description of the results and approaches/model systems framed in the context of their conceptual interest; and (3) an indication of the broader significance of the work. No references allowed in the Summary. For Reviews: abstract no more than 150 words |
| Main text | Main text word limits by article type: Articles: under 8,000 words (not including reference list, STAR Methods, or supplemental information); Short articles: not exceed 4,000 words (including title, author names and affiliations, summary, spaces, and figure legends but excluding STAR Methods text, supplemental item legends, and references section); Resources: under 7,000 words (not including reference list, STAR Methods, or supplemental information); Technology: under 7,000 words (not including reference list, STAR Methods, or supplemental information); Reviews: 5,000 to 8,000 words; Minireviews: no more than 3,500 words (including references and figure legends); Perspectives: 4,000–5,500 words; Commentaries: 2,000–3,000 words; Letters: no more than 1,500 words; Previews: limited to 1,500 words |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Up to 10 keywords encouraged (not mandatory). Keywords should be listed in the manuscript after the Summary, separated by commas. No MeSH requirement specified |
| References | Vancouver superscript style. In-text citations should be written as superscripts, e.g., 'Multiple reports support this^1,2' or 'This observation is supported by Smith et al.^1'. Note that 'et al.' should only be used after ten authors. Reference format example: Sondheimer, N., and Lindquist, S. (2000). Rnq1: an epigenetic modifier of protein function in yeast. Mol. Cell 5, 163–172 |
| Peer review | Transparent peer review (optional). Authors choose to opt in or opt out when submitting their manuscript for the first time. Reviewers' identities remain confidential unless reviewers choose to sign their reviews. If authors opt in, the reviewers' comments, editorial decision letters, and an editorial overview are made publicly available after publication as part of a comprehensive Transparent Peer Review Record |
| Submission | www.editorialmanager.com/cell-genomics/default.aspx |
Read the Cell Genomics guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Cell Genomics in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Cell Genomics papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Cell Genomics journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Cell Genomics guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through Editorial Manager.