Get your Carbon Capture Science and Technology paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.3
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 3 August, 2026
Submitting to Carbon Capture Science and Technology goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Carbon Capture Science and Technology guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Carbon Capture Science and Technology. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Carbon Capture Science and Technology journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Carbon Capture Science and Technology guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Carbon Capture Science and Technology guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | Carbon Capt Sci Technol requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Unstructured abstract required (no specific headings mandated for most article types). The abstract should state briefly the purpose of the research, the principal results and major conclusions. It must be able to stand alone. References should be avoided in abstracts. No specific word limit stated for standard Research Articles, Short Communications, Review Articles, or Perspectives. For Accounts: Instead of an 'Abstract', authors provide an 'Approach' which is a brief description (~250 words) of the research within the key references and the unique research perspective. Additionally, all revised submissions must include a tweetable abstract of 200 characters or fewer |
| Main text | By article type: Short Communications: less than 4 journal pages with references included. Must include Introduction, Results and Discussions, and Conclusions sections. Full-Length Research Articles: no page restrictions. Must consist of Introduction, Experimental, Results and Discussions, and Conclusions sections. Review Articles: no restrictions to length. Perspectives: normally no longer than 10 journal pages with references included. Accounts: normally no longer than 10 journal pages with references included and should include 5-10 Figures |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Maximum of 6 keywords required. Use American spelling and avoid general and plural terms and multiple concepts (avoid 'and', 'of'). Only abbreviations firmly established in the field may be eligible |
| References | Author-date citation style (Harvard-like). In-text citations: Single author: author's name and year; Two authors: both names and year; Three or more authors: first author's name followed by 'et al.' and year. Reference list: arranged first alphabetically, then chronologically if necessary. Format examples provided follow author-year style with DOI inclusion encouraged |
| Peer review | Single anonymized review process (single-blind). All contributions are initially assessed by the editor for suitability. Papers deemed suitable are then typically sent to a minimum of two independent expert reviewers to assess the scientific quality |
| Submission | submit.elsevier.com/CCST |
Read the Carbon Capture Science and Technology guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Carbon Capture Science and Technology in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Carbon Capt Sci Technol papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Carbon Capture Science and Technology journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Carbon Capture Science and Technology guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.