Get your Cancer Prevention Research paper right the first time: a ready-made structure with the right abstract and citations, so editors see your science, not formatting slips.
4.1
Authored by Sumalatha Gangadhar | Published on 3 August, 2026
Submitting to Cancer Prevention Research goes smoothly when your draft already matches the journal's own rules. Editors screen new manuscripts against the Cancer Prevention Research guide for authors before peer review, so formatting, structure, and required statements should be right on the first draft rather than repaired during upload. This template sets that structure up for you.
It is a manuscript shell aligned to Cancer Prevention Research. It covers front matter, the abstract the journal expects, a body organized to the journal's article types, and a reference list in the journal's required style. Confirm current scope and article types on the Cancer Prevention Research journal page before you draft.
Prepare the title, authors, affiliations, and ORCID iDs. Write the abstract to the journal's rule and word limit, organize the body to the article type, and apply the required reference style from the first citation. Complete every declaration (ethics, competing interests, funding, data availability) the Cancer Prevention Research guide for authors lists, and cite figures and tables in order.
The common failure modes are formatting or reference style that does not match the guide for authors, missing required statements, and an incomplete portal checklist. Clear all three against the Cancer Prevention Research guide for authors before you submit.
The shell mirrors what editorial staff check first: article-type fit, the abstract rules, required declarations, and the journal's reference style. For more detail see the author resources. When your draft is ready, upload it through the journal's submission system.
| Element | Cancer Prev Res requirement |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Unstructured abstract. Word limits vary by article type: Research Articles and Research Briefs require 250 words; Reviews, Minireviews, and Commentaries require 200 words. The abstract should recapitulate in abbreviated form the purpose of the study and the experimental technique, results, and data interpretations. Important terms relevant to content should be incorporated to assist indexers and searchers. Abbreviations should be kept to an absolute minimum. No references should be cited in the abstract. No mandatory headings are specified |
| Main text | Word counts are exclusive of cover page, abstract, methods section, tables, and references. By article type: Research Articles (5,000 words text, 6 tables/figures, 50 references); Research Briefs (2,500 words, up to 3 tables/figures, 25 references); Reviews (6,000 words, 5 figures/tables, 100 references); Minireviews (3,000 words, 5 figures/tables, 100 references); Commentaries (3,000 words, 5 tables/figures, 30 references); Letters to the Editor (400 words, no figures/tables unless approved, 5 references). Standard sections for research articles: Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion. These article size recommendations are not enforced for initial submissions |
| Declarations | Ethics approval/consent as applicable; competing interests; funding; data availability |
| Figures/tables | Publication-ready; cited in order |
| Supplemental | Upload separately when used |
| Keywords | Not specified in the official author guidelines |
| References | Numbered in order of first mention in the text. For manuscripts with more than 6 authors, list the first 6 authors followed by 'et al.' For 6 or fewer authors, list all authors. The reference style follows a format similar to AMA/NLM style based on the examples provided (author-year format with journal abbreviations). References need not be formatted according to journal style prior to initial submission, but must follow journal style for final publication. Reference limits by article type: Research Articles (50 references), Research Briefs (25), Reviews (100), Commentaries (30), Letters to the Editor (5) |
| Peer review | Single-blind (also called single-anonymous). The official editorial process page explicitly states: 'The single-blind peer review process used by all AACR journals is managed by a handling editor who is responsible for assigning appropriate expert external reviewers.' |
| Submission | preflight.paperpal.com/partner/aacr/canpreventionres/submit |
Read the Cancer Prevention Research guide for authors once before drafting and once before upload. Draft the abstract after results are stable. Set the reference style before adding citations. Keep a cover letter that states your contribution and fit to Cancer Prevention Research in under a page.
Skim two or three recent Cancer Prev Res papers to calibrate depth and figure style. Make the novelty clear in the first two pages. Deposit data and code when the policy on the Cancer Prevention Research journal page requires it. Disclose any preprint or conference version with identifiers in the cover letter.
Do one focused pass against the Cancer Prevention Research guide for authors: scope, length, reference style, required declarations, and figure quality. Then submit through the journal's submission system.