Why forefoot striking in minimal shoes might positively change the course of running injuries.
73
TL;DR: In this article, the benefits of barefoot running (typically an FFS pattern), and compare the lower extremity mechanics between FFS and RFS, are examined and the implications of these mechanical differences, in terms of injury, are discussed.
read more
About: This article is published in Journal of Sport and Health Science. The article was published on 01 Jun 2017. and is currently open access.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Ground reaction force metrics are not strongly correlated with tibial bone load when running across speeds and slopes: Implications for science, sport and wearable tech.
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that commonly-used GRF metrics can mislead the authors' understanding of loading on internal structures, such as the tibia, by not being strongly correlated with tibial bone load or overuse injury risk during running.
181
The effect of running on foot muscles and bones: A systematic review.
TL;DR: Results of relevant literature are limited and somewhat contradictory, and the outcome suggests that running may increase foot muscle volume, muscle cross-sectional area and bone density, but this seems to depend on training volume and experience.
40
Foot Angle and Loading Rate during Running Demonstrate a Nonlinear Relationship
Mikel R. Stiffler-Joachim,Christa M. Wille,Stephanie Kliethermes,William Johnston,Bryan C. Heiderscheit +4 more
TL;DR: The relationship between FIA and AVLR is best represented by a cubic model, and FIA should be treated as a continuous variable, because reducing FIA into categories may misrepresent the relationship with FIA and other gait variables.
Prediction on the plantar fascia strain offload upon Fascia taping and Low-Dye taping during running.
TL;DR: The study quantified the loading status of the plantar fascia during running and provided mechanical evidence to support the usage of taping as a mean to reduce fascial strain, thus possibly controlling injury risks for the runners.
36
A comparison of attachment methods of skin mounted inertial measurement units on tibial accelerations
TL;DR: Evaluated by systematically lower vertical accelerations, a more secure attachment method may be necessary for capturing the most representative measure of tibial accelerations during running, but a less secure method is sufficient for capturing tibIAL accelerations as a surrogate for impact loading forces.
35
References
Trade-offs in life-history evolution
TL;DR: This discussion finds that the genetic structure of a population, in particular the genetic variance-covariance matrix for a set of important life-history traits, reflects the very recent past, describes the present and predicts the near-term future.
Endurance running and the evolution of homo
TL;DR: Judged by several criteria, humans perform remarkably well at endurance running, thanks to a diverse array of features, many of which leave traces in the skeleton.
Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners
Daniel E. Lieberman,Madhusudhan Venkadesan,William A. Werbel,Adam I. Daoud,Susan E. D’Andrea,Irene S. Davis,Robert Ojiambo Mang’Eni,Robert Ojiambo Mang’Eni,Yannis P. Pitsiladis,Yannis P. Pitsiladis +9 more
TL;DR: Kinematic and kinetic analyses show that even on hard surfaces, barefoot runners who fore-foot strike generate smaller collision forces than shod rear-foot strikers, and this difference results primarily from a more plantarflexed foot at landing and more ankle compliance during impact, decreasing the effective mass of the body that collides with the ground.
Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: A systematic review
TL;DR: There was strong evidence that a long training distance per week in male runners and a history of previous injuries were risk factors for injuries, and that an increase in trainingdistance per week was a protective factor for knee injuries.
1.4K
Ground reaction forces in distance running
TL;DR: Ground reaction forces and center of pressure (C of P) patterns were studied in 17 subjects running at 4.5 ms −1 and the implications in the areas of running mechanics, shoe design and sports injury are discussed.
1.2K