Journal Article10.2307/2586308
When the Party Breaks Up: Exit and Voice among Japanese Legislators
TL;DR: The authors modifies the exit, voice, and loyalty framework developed by Hirschman and examines the utility of that framework using the recent change in Japan, that is, the demise of the so-called 1955 system in which the predominant conservatives confined the socialists to the status of a major but perennial opposition party.
read more
Abstract: In exploring the conflicts between individual interests and the conditions that facilitate the disintegration of a political party, this article modifies the exit, voice, and loyalty framework developed by Hirschman. The utility of that framework is examined using the recent change in Japan, that is, the demise of the so-called 1955 system, in which the predominant conservatives confined the socialists to the status of a major but perennial opposition party. The quantitative analysis focuses on the split of the Japanese Liberal Democratic Party and the internal dispute in the Democratic Socialist Party of Japan. These cases provide an interesting comparison of how individual characteristics and contextual conditions affect members' decisions to exercise exit and voice. At the same time, they illuminate how party-level changes have been influenced by intraparty factors.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Brand Dilution and the Breakdown of Political Parties in Latin America
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed an explanation for why a national political party that has been competitive for decades collapse over the course of a single electoral cycle, and tested this interactive hypothesis using matched comparisons of six party-election cases from Argentina and Venezuela.
•Book
Democracy without Competition in Japan: Opposition Failure in a One-Party Dominant State
Ethan Scheiner
- 29 Aug 2005
TL;DR: In this article, an explanation for why no opposition party has been able to offer itself as a credible challenger in Japan has been proposed, arguing that a far more plausible explanation rests on the predominance in Japan of clientelism, combined with a centralized government structure and electoral protection for groups that benefit from client-ism.
Parties as Political Intermediaries
Bernard Caillaud,Jean Tirole +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that intra-party competition contributes to keeping politicians on their toes, but unbridled competition may encourage politicians to challenge good platforms and to wage competition along socially suboptimal dimensions (for example, by privileging form over content).
221
Explaining party cohesion and discipline in democratic legislatures: purposiveness and contexts
TL;DR: In this article, the benefits and costs to legislators in democratic legislatures of joining and acting collectively and individualistically within political parties are explored. And the empirical evidence on how a multiplicity of systemic, party-level and situational factors supposedly impact cohesion/discipline levels.
Dealing in Discipline: Party Switching and Legislative Voting in the Italian Chamber of Deputies, 1988–2000
William B. Heller,Carol Mershon +1 more
TL;DR: In Italy, one out of four deputies in the Chamber of Deputies switched parties at least once, compared to only 20 switches in the U.S. Congress from 1947 to 1997 as mentioned in this paper.
130
References
•Book
An Economic Theory of Democracy
Anthony Downs
- 01 Jan 1957
TL;DR: Downs presents a rational calculus of voting that has inspired much of the later work on voting and turnout as discussed by the authors, particularly significant was his conclusion that a rational voter should almost never bother to vote.
18.8K
•Book
Exit, Voice, and Loyalty
Albert O. Hirschman
- 01 Jan 1970
Abstract: 1. Introduction and Doctrinal Background Enter "exit" and "voice" Latitude for deterioration, and slack in economic thought Exit and voice as impersonations of economics and politics 2. Exit How the exit option works Competition as collusive behavior 3. Voice Voice as a residual of exit Voice as an alternative to exit 4. A Special Difficulty in Combining Exit and Voice 5. How Monopoly Can be Comforted by Competition 6. On Spatial Duopoly and the Dynamics of Two-Party Systems 7. A Theory of Loyalty The activation of voice as a function of loyalty Loyalist behavior as modified by severe initiation and high penalties for exit Loyalty and the difficult exit from public goods (and evils) 8. Exit and Voice in American Ideology and Practice 9. The Elusive Optimal Mix of Exit and Voice Appendixes A. A simple diagrammatic representation of voice and exit B. The choice between voice and exit C. The reversal phenomenon D. Consumer reactions to price rise and quality decline in the case of several connoisseur goods F. The effects of severity of initiation on activism: design for an experiment (in collaboration with Philip G. Zimbardo and Mark Snyder) Index
4.8K
The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis*
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the causes and consequences of the expansion of the public economy following Schumpeter's discussion of the tax state, in terms of the extractive role of government and found that some nations have experienced a far greater rate of increase in recent years and, as a result, have a much larger public economy than other nations.
2.1K
•Book
Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe
Michael Laver,Norman Schofield +1 more
- 01 Jan 1990
TL;DR: The politics of coalition in Europe who plays the coalition game? what are the stakes? how do you win? who gets in? will it last? who get what? coalitions in a constrained real world.
1.2K
Elections, Coalitions, and Legislative Outcomes
TL;DR: In this article, the authors develop a multistage game-theoretic model of three-party competition under proportional representation, which is essentially defined by the vote shares each party receives in the general election, and the parties' electoral policy positions.