What moderates implicit—explicit consistency?

Question

1. What are the future works in "What moderates implicit – explicit consistency?" ?

2. What are the contributions mentioned in the paper "What moderates implicit – explicit consistency?" ?

3. What is the reason why the implicit – explicit consistency research should decline?

4. What are the common applications of the Implicit Association Test?

Accepted Answer

In their review the authors have discussed both the dominant issues and lingering questions for future investigations.. The authors end by discussing potential limitations of the reviewed literature and suggesting general strategies for future research.

Accepted Answer

This review places the question of implicit – explicit consistency into the tradition of attitude/trait – behaviour consistency ( e. g., Wicker, 1969 ).. Drawing on dual-process models, such as the recent distinction between associative and propositional representations ( Strack & Deutsch, 2004 ), the authors identify a working model of implicit – explicit consistency that organises the empirical evidence on implicit – explicit moderation into five factors: translation between implicit and explicit representations ( e. g., representational strength, awareness ), additional information integration for explicit representations ( e. g., need for cognition ), properties of explicit assessment ( e. g., social desirability concerns ), properties of implicit assessment ( e. g., situational malleability ), and research design factors ( e. g., sampling bias, measurement correspondence ).

Accepted Answer

As opportunity and motivation to alter the automatic response increase, the consistency between implicit and explicit indicators should decline.

Accepted Answer

The most common applications concern investigations of the attitude construct, racial stereotypes, and prejudice as a content domain, and the Implicit Association Test (IAT) as an implicit measurement method.

Accepted Answer

The degree of consistency between implicit and explicit indicators is a function of how strongly associative and propositional representations feed into each other and how well the implicit and explicit indicators reflect their latent representations respectively.

Accepted Answer

Probably the most widely used implicit measurement technique is the Implicit Association Test (IAT) developed by Greenwald et al. (1998).

Accepted Answer

Wicker (1969) argued that (explicitly assessed) attitudes and behaviour were correlated .30 or less, and that attitudes, therefore, accounted for a maximum of 10% of the variance in observed behaviour.

Accepted Answer

sampling of content domains for the meta-analysed studies was driven by research interests of different laboratories and may ‘‘oversample’’ from domains in which a dissociation is expected, whereas the Nosek (2005) study sampled across a wide range of domains.340 HOFMANN ET AL.

Accepted Answer

dimensionality and perceived distinctness from the norm have been shown to moderate consistency over and above representational strength (Nosek, 2005), pointing to the importance of structural features of representations and of interpersonal comparison processes as a source of consistency, respectively.

Accepted Answer

These theories make few predictions about when implicit and explicit indicators will correspond, but compared to a single representation framework they have the advantage of being able to incorporate moderators that influence the similarity of mental representations, beyond response biases that influence self-report.

Accepted Answer

In their view, most of the empirical evidence on moderators of implicit – explicit consistency can be meaningfully organised into five factors that correspond to this model: translation between implicit and explicit representations, additional information integration for explicit representations, properties of explicit assessment, properties of implicit assessment, and research design factors such as sampling selectivity and measurement correspondence (see Figure 1).

Accepted Answer

while the implications of strong, positive relations were considered important to establish convergent validity for attitude – behaviour relations, the opposite goal was evident for initial research on implicit – explicit consistency.

Accepted Answer

individuals could generate selfinferences about their implicit representations via observation of their own behaviour (Bem, 1972), even in the absence of mental experiences stemming from the associative representations.

Accepted Answer

One speculative explanation is that introspective efforts may trigger a multitude of processes and that context factors may determine which process gains more weight in which case (cf. Hixon & Swann, 1993).

What moderates implicit—explicit consistency?

Chat with Paper

AI Agents for this Paper

Most frequently asked questions

1. What are the future works in "What moderates implicit – explicit consistency?" ?

2. What are the contributions mentioned in the paper "What moderates implicit – explicit consistency?" ?

3. What is the reason why the implicit – explicit consistency research should decline?

4. What are the common applications of the Implicit Association Test?

5. What is the degree of consistency between implicit and explicit indicators?

6. What is the widely used implicit measurement technique?

7. What was Wicker’s view of attitudes and behaviour?

8. What is the reason why the Nosek (2005) study sampled across a wide?

9. What are the main characteristics of the dimensionality and perceived distinctness from the norm?

10. What is the advantage of a dual representation theory?

11. What are the factors that affect the correlation between implicit and explicit representations?

12. What was the goal of initial research on implicit consistency?

13. How could individuals generate selfinferences about their implicit representations?

14. What is the speculative explanation for the nonsignificant regression weight?

Citations

Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.

Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes

Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis.

European Review of Social Psychology: Stroebe/Social Psychology

Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation.

References

Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions

Society and the adolescent self-image

A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance

A Theory of Social Comparison Processes

Advances In Experimental Social Psychology

Related Papers (5)

Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test.

Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.

Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.

A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures

Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior