Open AccessBook
Visual programming
Nan C. Shu
- 01 Jan 1988
341
About: The article was published on 01 Jan 1988. and is currently open access. The article focuses on the topics: Symbolic programming & Visual programming language.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces
Brygg Ullmer,Hiroshi Ishii +1 more
TL;DR: The MCRpd interaction model for tangible interfaces as discussed by the authors is a conceptual framework for tangible user interfaces, which relates the role of physical and digital representations, physical control, and underlying digital models.
The application visualization system: a computational environment for scientific visualization
C. Upson,T.A. Faulhaber,D. Kamins,David H. Laidlaw,D. Schlegel,J. Vroom,R. Gurwitz,A. van Dam +7 more
TL;DR: This application visualization system (AVS) is an application framework targeted at scientists and engineers to make applications that combine interactive graphics and high computational requirements easier to develop for both programmers and nonprogrammers.
A Meta-Study of Algorithm Visualization Effectiveness
TL;DR: How students use AV technology has a greater impact on effectiveness than what AV technology shows them, and an agenda for future research into AV effectiveness is formulated.
841
Interactive sketching for the early stages of user interface design
James A. Landay,Brad A. Myers +1 more
- 01 May 1995
TL;DR: An interactive tool that allows designers to quickly sketch an interface using an electronic pad and stylus and can transform the sketch into a complete, finished interface in a specified look-and-feel.
Why looking isn't always seeing: readership skills and graphical programming
TL;DR: In this paper, the differences between textual and visual representations for software differ in effectiveness, and it is determined that the differences lie not so much in the textual-visual distinction as in the degree to which specific representations support the conventions experts expect.
509