Journal Article10.56103/nactaj.v66i1.15
Using multidisciplinary, conflict-based experiential learning to train students on how to address controversy at the public-private land interface
David Jachowski,Matias Aguerre,Gustavo Lascano,Keifer Titus,Thomas Scott +4 more
TL;DR: Multidisciplinary, conflict-based experiential learning course prepares students to address complex issues facing agricultural and natural resource managers working at the public-private land interface.
read more
Abstract: Agricultural and natural resource managers face complex problems that involve thinking across multiple disciplines, particularly in North America where professionals often have to work in multi-use landscapes containing both private and public lands. Here we describe a multidisciplinary, conflict-based experiential learning course we developed to prepare students to address complex issues facing future managers working at the public-private land interface. Using both pre- and post-course surveys and qualitative analysis of reflective essays, we observed that following our course students (1) were more aware of conservation needs and more sensitive to perspectives of various stakeholder groups concerning those needs, (2) embraced complexity and multidisciplinary thinking needed to address management challenges at the public-private land interface, and (3) showed appreciation of and became more comfortable discussing controversial issues with stakeholders and the general public. Students also became more willing to travel, work independently, and take a leading role in peer groups. By embedding students in a charged learning environment with multiple competing perspectives, our course has been able to build a more knowledgeable, empathetic and confident cohort of future employees who are better prepared to address complex issues facing agricultural and natural resource managers working at the public-private land interface.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
References
Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.
Justin Kruger,David Dunning +1 more
TL;DR: Across 4 studies, the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test performance and ability.
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
TL;DR: The core ideology of conservatism stresses resistance to change and justification of inequality and is motivated by needs that vary situationally and dispositionally to manage uncertainty and threat.
Global plight of native temperate grasslands: going, going, gone?
TL;DR: A new strategic direction for the next decade, underpinned by ten key focus areas, is presented in this article, where the most realistic opportunities to improve protection lie in central, eastern and western Asia where landscape-scale tracts of native temperate grassland remain in reasonable condition.
98
•Journal Article
Using experiential learning in wildlife courses to improve retention, problem solving, and decision-making
TL;DR: Experiential learning refers to contextually relevant knowledge acquired through "hands-on" problem solving, critical reflection, discussion, and decision-making as mentioned in this paper, which can help students acquire the necessary skills to succeed in wildlife management.
75
Finding your way in the interdisciplinary forest: notes on educating future conservation practitioners
Karen Andrade,C. Corbin,Sibyl Diver,M. V. Eitzel,J. Williamson,Justin S. Brashares,Louise Fortmann +6 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore the challenges of educating interdisciplinary thinkers who can address the management of complex socio-ecological systems, such as forests, by sharing their experiences from several perspectives, and demonstrate the importance of safe space and patience, the need for adequate time to build trust and respect, and the recognition that interdisciplinary thinking is developed and reinforced in multiple contexts.
64