Open AccessPosted Content
Universal interactive preferences
Jayant V. Ganguli,Aviad Heifetz +1 more
2
TL;DR: The authors showed that a universal preference type space exists under much more general conditions than those postulated by Epstein and Wang (1996) and showed that preferences can be encoded by a countable collection of continuous functionals, while the preferences themselves need not necessarily be continuous or regular, e.g., in the case of lexicographic preferences.
read more
Abstract: We prove that a universal preference type space exists under much more general conditions than those postulated by Epstein and Wang (1996). To wit, it is enough that preferences can be encoded by a countable collection of continuous functionals, while the preferences themselves need not necessarily be continuous or regular, like, e.g., in the case of lexicographic preferences. The proof relies on a far-reaching generalization of a method developed by Heifetz and Samet (1998).
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Epistemic Game Theory
Eddie Dekel,Marciano Siniscalchi +1 more
TL;DR: Building upon explicit assumptions about elicitable primitives, classical and recent developments in epistemic game theory are presented and characterizations of a nonexhaustive, but wide, range of solution concepts are provided.
Universal Interactive Preferences
TL;DR: This article proved that a universal preference type space exists under more general conditions than those postulated by Epstein and Wang (1996) and showed that preferences can be encoded monotonically in rich enough ways by collections of continuous, monotone real-valued functionals over acts, which determine preferences over limit acts.