Book Chapter10.1007/978-94-011-2942-8_7
Three Vignettes on the State of Economic Rhetoric
Philip Mirowski
- 01 Jan 1992
- pp 235-271
12
TL;DR: A funny thing happened to Rhetoric on its way to being recruited as the lastest in a long line of defenses of the legitimacy of neoclassical economics as mentioned in this paper, which began as an attempt to import considerations from recent developments in the history of science, hermeneutics, literary theory, and other postmodern pursuits, and appears now to have evolved into a simple castigation of any citation of philosophy of science or methodology in the context of an economic argument.
read more
Abstract: A funny thing happened to Rhetoric on its way to being recruited as the lastest in a long line of defenses of the legitimacy of neoclassical economics. What began as an attempt to import considerations from recent developments in the history of science, hermeneutics, literary theory, and other postmodern pursuits (McCloskey, 1983; 1985) provoked such an outcry of pollution taboo from economists, that it appears now to have evolved into a simple castigation of any citation of philosophy of science or methodology in the context of an economic argument (McCloskey, 1988).1This palpable degeneration of what began as a laudable call for greater self-consciousness in economic discourse was perhaps a predictable outcome, given that any attempt to renounce the scientism of economic discourse, while maintaining the scientistic explanatory structure of neoclassical economic theory, was an inherently self-contradictory procedure (Mirowski, 1987; 1990).2A postmodern neoclassical theory would be rather like an a-political Paul de Man: looks good on paper, but the suspicion lingers that the denial of a world outside the text is in the last analysis motivated by a fervent desire to keep the skeletons locked in the closet. Nevertheless, I would like to argue that the lessons of rhetoric
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric
TL;DR: In this article, Klamer and McCloskey discuss the role of economic rhetoric in the human conversation and the consequences of using it in economics, and discuss the importance of rhetorical aspects of statistical hypothesis testing in economics.
234
deconstructing silence: the queer political economy of the social articulation of desire
TL;DR: In this article, a Bayesian simulation is constructed of people interacting and using probits to compare their rankings of alternatives to estimate the subjective probability i.) that others have the same tastes as them, and ii.), for each alternative, that this alternative is their best choice.
17
•Posted Content
A Survey of Feminist Economics
TL;DR: The roots of the feminist economics which has come, the 1990s, to be widely recognized as in a distinct field of economics are to be found in theoretical developments in both neoclassical economics and in feminist theory from around the 1960s.
15
Tacit preachments are the worst kind
TL;DR: The authors presents examples of economists pressing methodologies on students and professional colleagues without actually articulating, and thus exposing to critical examination, the methodological precepts being urged, such behavior has twisted economic research and doctrine.
8
References
•Book
The Rhetoric of Economics
Donald N. McCloskey
- 01 Jan 1985
TL;DR: McCloskey as discussed by the authors describes how economic discourse employs metaphor, authority, symmetry, and other rhetorical means of persuasion, showing economists to be human persuaders and poets of the marketplace, even in their most technical and mathematical moods.
2K
More heat than light: Contents
Philip Mirowski
- 01 Jan 1989
Abstract: More Heat Than Light is a history of how physics has drawn some inspiration from economics and also how economics has sought to emulate physics, especially with regard to the theory of value. It traces the development of the energy concept in Western physics and its subsequent effect upon the invention and promulgation of neoclassical economics. Any discussion of the standing of economics as a science must include the historical symbiosis between the two disciplines. Starting with the philosopher Emile Meyerson's discussion of the relationship between notions of invariance and causality in the history of science, the book surveys the history of conservation principles in the Western discussion of motion. Recourse to the metaphors of the economy are frequent in physics, and the concepts of value, motion, and body reinforced each other throughout the development of both disciplines, especially with regard to practices of mathematical formalisation. However, in economics subsequent misuse of conservation principles led to serious blunders in the mathematical formalisation of economic theory. The book attempts to provide the reader with sufficient background in the history of physics in order to appreciate its theses. The discussion is technically detailed and complex, and familiarity with calculus is required.
1.1K
More heat than light : economics as social physics, physics as nature's economics
TL;DR: The history of physics envy can be found in this paper, where the authors discuss the history of the energy concept and its relationship with the field theory of value in political economy, and the corruption of the field theories of value and the retrogression to substance theories of values.
869
•Book
How Experiments End
Peter Galison,W. D. Hackmann +1 more
- 01 Jan 1987
TL;DR: Galison as discussed by the authors provides excellent histories of three experimental episodes: the measurement of the gyromagnetic ratio of the electron, the discovery of the mu meson, or muon, and discovery of weak neutral currents.
715