Journal Article10.1017/s1352465825100994
The Oxford Paranoia Defence Behaviours Questionnaire (O-PDQ): assessing paranoia-related safety-seeking behaviours
Sinéad Lambe,Sophie Mulhall,Jessica C. Bird,Kira Williams,Joanna Mitchell,Mollie Roddan,Glory Sokunle,Laina Rosebrock,Daniel Freeman,Felicity Waite +9 more
TL;DR: Researchers developed the Oxford Paranoia Defence Behaviours Questionnaire (O-PDQ) to assess paranoia-related defence behaviours, a key factor in maintaining persecutory delusions, with two scales demonstrating good reliability and validity in a large sample.
read more
Abstract: Defence behaviours - actions carried out to reduce perceived threat - are an important maintenance factor for persecutory delusions. Avoidance of feared situations and subtle in-situation behaviours reduce opportunities for new learning and are erroneously credited for the non-occurrence of harm; hence inaccurate fears are maintained. In contrast, exposure to feared situations whilst dropping defence behaviours - a key technique of cognitive therapy for paranoia - allows the discovery of new information concerning safety, thereby reducing persecutory delusions. We aimed to develop for use in research and clinical practice a self-report assessment of paranoia-related defence behaviours. A 64-item pool was developed from interviews with 106 patients with persecutory delusions, and completed by 53 patients with persecutory delusions, 592 people with elevated paranoia, and 2108 people with low paranoia. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to derive the measure. Reliability and validity were assessed. Two scales were developed: a 12-item avoidance scale and a 20-item in-situation defences scale. The avoidance scale had three factors (indoor spaces, outdoor spaces, and interactions) with an excellent model fit (CFI=0.98, TLI=0.97, RMSEA=0.04, SRMR=0.027). The in-situation defences scale had a 5-factor model (maintaining safety at home, mitigating risk, staying vigilant, preparing for escape, and keeping a low profile) with a good fit (CFI=0.95, TLI=0.94, RMSEA=0.046, SRMR=0.039). Both scales demonstrated good internal reliability, test-retest reliability, and construct validity. The Oxford Paranoia Defence Behaviours Questionnaire is a psychometrically robust scale that can assess a key factor in the maintenance of persecutory delusions.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Figures
References
The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.
TL;DR: In addition to making criteria-based diagnoses of depressive disorders, the PHQ-9 is also a reliable and valid measure of depression severity, which makes it a useful clinical and research tool.
35.8K
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7
TL;DR: In this article, a 7-item anxiety scale (GAD-7) had good reliability, as well as criterion, construct, factorial, and procedural validity, and increasing scores on the scale were strongly associated with multiple domains of functional impairment.
24.8K
lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling
TL;DR: The aims behind the development of the lavaan package are explained, an overview of its most important features are given, and some examples to illustrate how lavaan works in practice are provided.
The qualitative content analysis process
Satu Elo,Helvi Kyngäs +1 more
TL;DR: Inductive content analysis is used in cases where there are no previous studies dealing with the phenomenon or when it is fragmented, and a deductive approach is useful if the general aim was to test a previous theory in a different situation or to compare categories at different time periods.
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures
TL;DR: In this article, a general null model based on modified independence among variables is proposed to provide an additional reference point for the statistical and scientific evaluation of covariance structure models, and the importance of supplementing statistical evaluation with incremental fit indices associated with the comparison of hierarchical models.
18.4K

