Journal Article10.1007/S11135-009-9282-3
The method of constant stimuli with three rating categories and the use of Rasch models
23
TL;DR: In this paper, Maestrini et al. computed individual and general thresholds differentiating constancy from both acceleration and deceleration for all the different experimental conditions, and showed a data set derived from an experiment on rhythm perception where two groups of experimental and naive subjects were asked to judge whether the listened rhythm was constant, accelerated or decelerated.
read more
Abstract: Logistic Models support an alternative general solution to compute the point of subjective equality (Vidotto et al., I modelli simple logistic e rating scale nella determinazione del punto di eguaglianza soggettivo: una nuova prospettiva per il metodo degli stimoli costanti, 1996) when the Method of Constant Stimuli is used (Bock and Jones, The Measurement and Prediction of Judgment and Choice, 1968). The Extended Logistic Models (Andrich, Appl. Psychol. Meas. II:581–594, 1978) offer the theoretical frame to compute individual and general thresholds when the method of constant stimuli is applied using a forced choice with more than two alternatives. As an example of the advantages of the application of this procedure, we show a data-set derived from an experiment on rhythm perception (Maestrini, La percezione del cambiamento nei ritmi uditivi, 2003), where two groups of experimental and naive subjects were asked to judge whether the listened rhythm was constant, accelerated or decelerated. We have computed individual and general thresholds differentiating constancy from both acceleration and deceleration for all the different experimental conditions. The main advantage of this solution, compared to traditional psychophysical techniques, is not only related to better estimates of the individual point of subjective equality. The improvement can be summarized in the available fit tests to verify the agreement between the model both for stimuli and subjects.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Counting and quantification: Comparing psychometric and metrological perspectives on visual perceptions of number
TL;DR: Independent sources of measurement uncertainty, such as under-estimation of scores, are distinguished from separate estimates of task challenge and individual counting ability, and accounted for in estimates of reliability of the various measures.
70
Not only correlations: a different approach for investigating the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and job performance based on workers and employees’ perception
TL;DR: In this paper, a study on the relationship between the Big Five of personality and job performance was carried out by surveying workers and employees' perception on the matter instead of passing through the computation of possibly faked (and biased) correlation coefficients between them.
26
Perceptual ratings of opposite spatial properties: do they lie on the same dimension?
TL;DR: Whether opposite judgments of height, size, width and length (high/low, large/small, wide/narrow, and long/short) imply underlying unidimensional continua imply a possible explanation for the lack of unidimensionality is looked at.
23
Assessment and development centers: judgment biases and risks of using idiographic and nomothetic approaches to collecting information on people to be evaluated and trained in organizations
Riccardo Sartori,Andrea Ceschi +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a critical review of what psychological science has found, and not so recently, in the field of assessment and development of psychological characteristics, in terms of risks and biases.
21
To be objective in Experimental Phenomenology: a Psychophysics application
TL;DR: The aim of this study is to show that Experimental Phenomenology can lead to conclusions objective and quantifiable and propose a procedure allowing to obtain objective measuring using the Rasch mathematical model able to describe the experimental data gathered in Experimental phenomenology procedures.
References
•Book
Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores
Frederic M. Lord,Melvin R. Novick,Allan Birnbaum +2 more
- 01 Jan 1968
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a survey of test theory models and their application in the field of mental test analysis. But the focus of the survey is on test-score theories and models, and not the practical applications and limitations of each model studied.
8.5K
Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores.
Abstract: This is a reprint of the orginal book released in 1968. Our primary goal in this book is to sharpen the skill, sophistication, and in- tuition of the reader in the interpretation of mental test data, and in the construction and use of mental tests both as instruments of psychological theory and as tools in the practical problems of selection, evaluation, and guidance. We seek to do this by exposing the reader to some psychologically meaningful statistical theories of mental test scores. Although this book is organized in terms of test-score theories and models, the practical applications and limitations of each model studied receive substantial emphasis, and these discussions are presented in as nontechnical a manner as we have found possible. Since this book catalogues a host of test theory models and formulas, it may serve as a reference handbook. Also, for a limited group of specialists, this book aims to provide a more rigorous foundation for further theoretical research than has heretofore been available.One aim of this book is to present statements of the assumptions, together with derivations of the implications, of a selected group of statistical models that the authors believe to be useful as guides in the practices of test construction and utilization. With few exceptions we have given a complete proof for each major result presented in the book. In many cases these proofs are simpler, more complete, and more illuminating than those originally offered. When we have omitted proofs or parts of proofs, we have generally provided a reference containing the omitted argument. We have left some proofs as exercises for the reader, but only when the general method of proof has already been demonstrated. At times we have proved only special cases of more generally stated theorems, when the general proof affords no additional insight into the problem and yet is substantially more complex mathematically.
4.5K
A Rasch Model for Partial Credit Scoring.
TL;DR: In this paper, an unidimensional latent trait model for responses scored in two or more ordered categories is developed, which can be viewed as an extension of Andrich's Rating Scale model to situations in which ordered response alternatives are free to vary in number and structure from item to item.
3.8K
Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement
TL;DR: In this article, the essential character of simultaneous conjoint measurement is described by an axiomatization for the comparision of effects of (or responses to) pairs formed from two specified kinds of "quantities".
2K
•Journal Article
Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval.
TL;DR: The Rasch measurement model provides the necessary and sufficient means to transform ordinal counts into linear measures and is being successfully applied to rating scales.
735
Related Papers (5)
Trevor G. Bond,Christine M. Fox +1 more
- 01 Apr 2001