Journal Article10.1037/PMU0000250
The emotional bond between neuroticism and music.
14
About: This article is published in Psychomusicology: Music, Mind and Brain. The article was published on 01 Jun 2020. The article focuses on the topics: Neuroticism & Big Five personality traits.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Mental health and music engagement: review, framework, and guidelines for future studies.
Daniel E. Gustavson,Peyton L Coleman,John R. Iversen,Hermine H. Maes,Reyna L. Gordon,Miriam D. Lense,Miriam D. Lense +6 more
TL;DR: A recent review as mentioned in this paper summarizes the existing state of music engagement and mental health studies, identifying their strengths and weaknesses, and proposes a theoretical model to describe the importance of simultaneously considering music-mental health associations at the levels of correlated genetic and/or environmental influences vs. (bi)directional associations, interactions with genetic risk factors, treatment efficacy, and mediation through brain structure and function.
•Book
The Principles of Psychology
G.P. Putnam's Sons
- 11 Apr 2018
TL;DR: For instance, the authors discusses the multiplicity of the consciousness of self in the form of the stream of thought and the perception of space in the human brain, which is the basis for our work.
38
Generalization of auditory expertise in audio engineers and instrumental musicians
Francesco Caprini,Sijia Zhao,Maria Chait,Trevor Agus,Ulrich Pomper,Adam Tierney,Frederic Dick +6 more
TL;DR: Auditory expertise in audio engineers and musicians is generalizable to various auditory tasks and naturalistic acoustic scenarios, with musicians showing advantages in selective attention and speech in noise perception, while engineers excel in auditory scene analysis and memorization.
4
Development and Psychometric Validation of the Music Receptivity Scale.
Mahesh George,Judu V Ilavarasu +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, a new construct, termed music receptivity, is introduced and discussed in this work, which can be defined as a measure of the extent of internalization that an individual has, to a given piece of music, as measured at the point of listening.
A correlation study of music training, adult attachment, and personality traits using a large-sample questionnaire.
Ying Liu,Xiaolin Liu,Maoping Zheng +2 more
TL;DR: Music training is associated with adult attachment style and personality traits, enhancing secure attachment and positive personality traits while regulating insecure attachment and neuroticism.
3
References
•Book
心理学原理 = The principles of psychology
William James
- 01 Jan 2010
Abstract: Arguably the greatest single work in the history of psychology. James's analyses of habit, the nature of emotion, the phenomenology of attention, the stream of thought, the perception of space, and the multiplicity of the consciousness of self are still widely cited and incorporated into contemporary theoretical accounts of these phenomena.
9.8K
The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives.
Oliver P. John,Sanjay Srivastava +1 more
- 01 Jan 1999
TL;DR: The Big Five taxonomy as discussed by the authors is a taxonomy of personality dimensions derived from analyses of the natural language terms people use to describe themselves 3 and others, and it has been used for personality assessment.
9.1K
The Structure of Phenotypic Personality Traits
TL;DR: This personal historical article traces the development of the Big-Five factor structure, whose growing acceptance by personality researchers has profoundly influenced the scientific study of individual differences.
Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues.
Oliver P. John,Laura P. Naumann,Christopher J. Soto +2 more
- 01 Jan 2008
Abstract: Since the first version of this chapter (John, 1990) was completed in the late 1980s, the field of personality trait research has changed dramatically. At that time, the Big Five personality dimensions, now seemingly ubiquitous, were hardly known. Researchers, as well as practitioners in the field of personality assessment, were faced with a bewildering array of personality scales from which to choose, with little guidance and no organizing theory or framework at hand. What made matters worse was that scales with the same name might measure concepts that were quite different, and scales with different names might measure concepts that were quite similar. Although diversity and scientific pluralism can be useful, systematic accumulation of findings and communication among researchers had become almost impossible amidst the cacophony of competing concepts and scales. At the University of California, Berkeley, for example, researchers studied personality with as few as two, and as many as 20 concepts, including the two dimensions of egoresilience and egocontrol that Block and Block (1980) measured with their California Q-sort; the four scales on the Myers– Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI; Myers & McCaulley, 1985) that measure extraversion, feeling, judging, and intuition; and the 20 scales on the California Psychological Inventory (CPI; Gough, 1987) measuring folk concepts such as capacity for status, selfcontrol, wellbeing, tolerance, and achievement via independence (see Table 4.1). At the time, many personality researchers were hoping to be the one who would discover the right structure that all others would then adopt, thus transforming the fragmented field into a community speaking a common language. However, we now know that such an integration was not to be achieved by any one researcher or by any one theoretical perspective. As Allport once put it, “each assessor has his own pet units and uses a pet battery of diagnostic devices” (1958, p. 258). What personality psychology lacked was a descriptive model, or taxonomy, of its subject matter. One of the central goals of scientific taxonomies is the definition of overarching domains within which large numbers of specific instances can be understood in a simplified way. Thus, in personchAPTeR 4
3.5K
Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.
TL;DR: The present study used meta-analytic techniques to determine the patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course and showed that people increase in measures of social dominance, conscientiousness, and emotional stability in young adulthood and decrease in both of these domains in old age.
3.3K