1. What have the authors contributed in "Standardizing minority languages" ?
By considering the perspectives and actions of people who participate in or are affected by minority language politics, the contributors aim to provide a comparative and nuanced analysis of the complexity and tensions inherent in minority language standardization processes.. This volume provides new insight into how social actors in a wide range of geographical settings embrace, contribute to, resist and also reject ( aspects of ) minority language standardization.
read more
2. What are the future works mentioned in the paper "Standardizing minority languages" ?
The imagined future of DiidxazáSpanish biliteracy put forward by language advocates is in line with a positive shift towards self-determination and pluralism in a national context that now recognizes Indigenous languages as national languages alongside Spanish, but unfortunately, it remains starkly separate from some of the goals and concerns which are urgent for many education actors.. The possibility of a future where Diidxazá users are biliterate and socially valued in local, national, and international spheres is one which all stakeholders would readily pursue ; however, there is less agreement on the way to turn this social imaginary into a reality.. Whether ongoing standardization efforts are successful in strengthening the status of Diidxazá language and producing a future biliterate speech community will ultimately be negotiated by multiple social actors.. If the long “ That ’ s Too Much to Learn ” 171 and rich history of past IZ writing is any indication, the future is likely to hold many interesting developments.
read more





