Journal Article10.1016/J.COMNET.2015.02.014
Software-Defined Networking
347
TL;DR: This paper tries to cover three main parts of SDN: applications, the control plane, and the data plane anticipating that these efforts will help researchers set appropriate and meaningful directions for future SDN research.
read more
About: This article is published in Computer Networks. The article was published on 22 Apr 2015. The article focuses on the topics: Software-defined networking & OpenFlow.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
A survey on 5G
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate and discuss serious limitations of the fourth generation (4G) cellular networks and corresponding new features of 5G networks, and present a comparative study of the proposed architectures that can be categorized on the basis of energy-efficiency, network hierarchy, and network types.
Software-Defined Networking for Internet of Things: A Survey
TL;DR: A comprehensive survey of different SDN-based technologies, which are useful to fulfill the requirements of IoT, from different networking aspects—edge, access, core, and data center networking.
385
Software Defined Optical Networks (SDONs): A Comprehensive Survey
TL;DR: This article comprehensively survey studies that examine the SDN paradigm in optical networks; in brief, it mainly organize the SDON studies into studies focused on the infrastructure layer, the control layer, and the application layer.
Software-defined networking (SDN): a survey
TL;DR: This paper aims to shed light on SDN related issues and give insight into the challenges facing the future of this revolutionary network model, from both protocol and architecture perspectives, and present different existing solutions and mitigation techniques that address SDN scalability, elasticity, dependability, reliability, high availability, resiliency, security, and performance concerns.
371
Hybrid SDN Networks: A Survey of Existing Approaches
TL;DR: A comprehensive up-to-date survey of the research and development in the field of hybrid SDN networks is presented and guidelines for future research on hybridSDN networks are derived.
340
References
OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks
Nick McKeown,Thomas Anderson,Hari Balakrishnan,Guru Parulkar,Larry L. Peterson,Jennifer Rexford,Scott Shenker,Jonathan S. Turner +7 more
- 31 Mar 2008
TL;DR: This whitepaper proposes OpenFlow: a way for researchers to run experimental protocols in the networks they use every day, based on an Ethernet switch, with an internal flow-table, and a standardized interface to add and remove flow entries.
B4: experience with a globally-deployed software defined wan
Sushant Jain,Alok Kumar,Subhasree Mandal,Joon Ong,Leon Poutievski,Arjun Singh,Subbaiah Venkata,Jim Wanderer,Junlan Zhou,Min Zhu,Jonathan Zolla,Urs Hölzle,Stephen Stuart,Amin Vahdat +13 more
- 27 Aug 2013
TL;DR: This work presents the design, implementation, and evaluation of B4, a private WAN connecting Google's data centers across the planet, using OpenFlow to control relatively simple switches built from merchant silicon.
A Survey of Software-Defined Networking: Past, Present, and Future of Programmable Networks
TL;DR: The SDN architecture and the OpenFlow standard in particular are presented, current alternatives for implementation and testing of SDN-based protocols and services are discussed, current and future SDN applications are examined, and promising research directions based on the SDN paradigm are explored.
A survey of information-centric networking
TL;DR: This work compares and discusses design choices and features of proposed ICN architectures, focusing on the following main components: named data objects, naming and security, API, routing and transport, and caching.
1.9K
NOX: towards an operating system for networks
Natasha Gude,Teemu Koponen,Justin Pettit,Ben Pfaff,Martin Casado,Nick McKeown,Scott Shenker +6 more
- 01 Jul 2008
TL;DR: The question posed here is: Can one build a network operating system at significant scale?