Journal Article10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126614
SMAR: Summary-Aware Multi-Aspect Recommendation
TL;DR: This paper proposes SMAR, a recommendation system that leverages user summaries to select key reviews, capture fine-grained user preferences, and model item aspects, outperforming state-of-art approaches in rating prediction accuracy on Amazon datasets.
read more
Abstract: Extracting user preferences and item features from reviews to assist recommendations is becoming increasingly popular. However, on the one hand, existing works generally select reviews based on how well user reviews match item reviews. They ignore that reviews may contain noise such as irrelevant phrases, which will affect the accuracy of selecting important reviews. In contrast, summaries written by users are abstracts of reviews that contain critical item feature information. They can be adopted to identify crucial reviews and further capture user’s fine-grained preferences from reviews. In addition, current methods do not consider that different items have different aspects in the same domain. They normally set a fixed number of aspects of the entire domain to get coarse-grained user preferences and item features. However, when modeling the user’s preferences for the current item, it might be more important to capture the corresponding aspects of the item preferences. Therefore, in this paper, we are motivated to propose a Summary-Aware Multi-Aspect Recommendation (SMAR). Specifically, we first construct a Summary-Aware Review Selection Module which adopts summaries to alleviate noise in reviews, identifying key reviews accurately. We then design a Summary-Aware Multi-Aspect Module which captures targeted user preferences towards the current item’s aspects. Finally, we employ Latent Factor Model to complete the recommendation process. The experimental results on Amazon datasets show that our method significantly outperfoms state-of-art approaches in terms of rating prediction accuracy.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
References
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Jeffrey Pennington,Richard Socher,Christopher D. Manning +2 more
- 01 Oct 2014
TL;DR: A new global logbilinear regression model that combines the advantages of the two major model families in the literature: global matrix factorization and local context window methods and produces a vector space with meaningful substructure.
Matrix Factorization Techniques for Recommender Systems
TL;DR: As the Netflix Prize competition has demonstrated, matrix factorization models are superior to classic nearest neighbor techniques for producing product recommendations, allowing the incorporation of additional information such as implicit feedback, temporal effects, and confidence levels.
Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples
TL;DR: The standard nonparametric randomization and permutation testing ideas are developed at an accessible level, using practical examples from functional neuroimaging, and the extensions for multiple comparisons described.
•Proceedings Article
Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmax
Eric Jang,Shixiang Gu,Ben Poole +2 more
- 03 Nov 2016
TL;DR: Gumbel-Softmax as mentioned in this paper replaces the non-differentiable samples from a categorical distribution with a differentiable sample from a novel Gumbel softmax distribution, which has the essential property that it can be smoothly annealed into the categorical distributions.
5.5K
Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance
Cort J. Willmott,Kenji Matsuura +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the root-mean-square error (RMSE) and the mean absolute error (MAE) were examined to describe average model-performance error, and it was shown that MAE is a more natural measure of average error than RMSE.
5K