Open Access
SHORT TITLE: SEX DIFFERENCES IN EMOTION PROCESSING Reduced Emotion Processing Efficiency in Healthy Males Relative to Females
Sara L. Weisenbach,Lisa J. Rapport,Emily M. Briceño,Aaron C. Vederman,Linas A. Bieliauskas,Monica N. Starkman,Melvin G. McInnis,Jon-Kar Zubieta,Scott A. Langenecker +8 more
- 01 Jan 2012
45
TL;DR: Sex differences in categorization of facial emotions and activation of brain regions supportive of those classifications suggest that females and males process emotions using different neural pathways, and these differences cannot be explained by performance variations.
read more
Abstract: This study examined sex differences in categorization of facial emotions and activation of brain regions supportive of those classifications. In Experiment 1, performance on the Facial Emotion Perception Test (FEPT) was examined among 75 healthy females and 63 healthy males. Females were more accurate in the categorization of fearful expressions relative to males. In Experiment 2, 3T functional magnetic resonance imaging data were acquired for a separate sample of 21 healthy females and 17 healthy males while performing the FEPT. Activation to neutral facial expressions was subtracted from activation to sad, angry, fearful and happy facial expressions. Although females and males demonstrated activation in some overlapping regions for all emotions, many regions were exclusive to females or males. For anger, sad and happy, males displayed a larger extent of activation than did females, and greater height of activation was detected in diffuse cortical and subcortical regions. For fear, males displayed greater activation than females only in right postcentral gyri. With one exception in females, performance was not associated with activation. Results suggest that females and males process emotions using different neural pathways, and these differences cannot be explained by performance variations.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Prefrontal EEG alpha asymmetry changes while observing disaster happening to other people: cardiac correlates and prediction of emotional impact
Ilona Papousek,Elisabeth M. Weiss,Günter Schulter,Andreas Fink,Eva M. Reiser,Helmut K. Lackner +5 more
TL;DR: The study provides further evidence for prefrontal EEG alpha asymmetry changes in response to relevant stimuli reflecting an individual's sensitivity to negative social-emotional cues encountered in everyday life.
78
Sex differences in traumatic brain injury: a multi-dimensional exploration in genes, hormones, cells, individuals, and society
TL;DR: It turns out that multiple factors contribute to the gender differences after TBI, not merely the perspective of gender and sex hormones, as well as the incidence of cognitive impairment and the social integration problems it caused.
Childhood abuse and deprivation are associated with distinct sex-dependent differences in brain morphology.
Daphne Everaerd,Floris Klumpers,Marcel P. Zwiers,Tulio Guadalupe,Barbara Franke,Iris van Oostrom,Aart H. Schene,Guillén Fernández,Indira Tendolkar +8 more
TL;DR: The results suggest that even in a healthy population, CA subtypes are related to specific alterations in brain structure, which are modulated by sex, which may help understand neurodevelopmental consequences related to CA.
63
The female advantage: sex as a possible protective factor against emotion recognition impairment following traumatic brain injury
TL;DR: It is suggested that sex may serve as a protective factor for social impairment following TBI and inform clinicians working with TBI as well as research on the neurophysiological correlates of sex differences in social functioning.
Influence of gender in the recognition of basic facial expressions: a critical literature review
TL;DR: The analysis of the studies conducted to date do not allow for definite conclusions concerning the role of the observer's gender in the recognition of facial emotion, mostly because of the absence of standardized methods of investigation.
46
References
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Vijay A. Mittal,Elaine F. Walker +1 more
TL;DR: An issue concerning the criteria for tic disorders is highlighted, and how this might affect classification of dyskinesias in psychotic spectrum disorders.
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Karl J. Friston,Andrew P. Holmes,Keith J. Worsley,J-B. Poline,Chris D. Frith,Richard S. J. Frackowiak +5 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a general approach that accommodates most forms of experimental layout and ensuing analysis (designed experiments with fixed effects for factors, covariates and interaction of factors).
Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI.
TL;DR: A critical comparison of findings across individual studies is provided and suggests that separate brain regions are involved in different aspects of emotion.
3.7K