School-based promotion of physical literacy: a scoping review
Martin Grauduszus,Lennart Koch,Stefan Wessely,Christine Joisten +3 more
1
TL;DR: School-based promotion of physical literacy: scoping review summarizes existing interventions and their effects on physical, cognitive, and affective domains.
read more
Abstract: Introduction The role of physical activity in children’s healthy development is undisputed, with school-based interventions being seen as a priority. The promotion of physical literacy (PL) seems to be promising due to its holistic approach, combining physical, cognitive, and affective domains. To develop recommendations for possible measures, we compiled existing literature on existing school-based PL interventions. Methods Five databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, ERIC, and PsycInfo) were searched between July 6 and July 10, 2023, by combining the terms “physical literacy,” “school,” “program,” “workshop,” “intervention,” and “curriculum” as well as a manual search. Records were screened in a two-stage process by two independent authors using a priori criteria. Eligible studies concerned PL interventions in the school context. The included records were sorted according to school type/population, structure, content, PL domains addressed, and evaluation. Results In total, 706 articles were found through the database search and an additional 28 articles through the manual search. After removing duplicates, 502 publications remained, which were screened by title and abstract, leaving 82 full texts. These were cut down to 37 articles describing 31 different programs (19 in primary schools, eight in secondary schools, one in both primary and secondary schools, and three unspecified). Most interventions were conducted during physical education classes (n = 12). All three PL domains were addressed by five interventions, while 11 interventions solely concerned the physical domain. In addition, 21 interventions evaluated their effects on PL. Most evaluations showed small to moderate but inconsistent effects on several PL-related constructs (e.g., self-efficacy, motivation, movement skills). Interventions incorporating all three domains reported positive effects on physical competence and enjoyment. Discussion Although there is a growing body of data related to school-based PL promotion, their effects and practical application remains relatively underdeveloped: study designs, study quality, PL assessments, and results are heterogeneous. Corresponding research adhering to the holistic approach of PL will be crucial in clarifying the potential lifelong role of PL in promoting physical activity, increasing health and well-being and to actually enable development of recommendations for action.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Physical Literacy and Physical Activity in Early Years Education: What’s Known, What’s Done, and What’s Needed?
Natalie Weir,Andy Pringle,Clare M. P. Roscoe +2 more
TL;DR: This study explores physical literacy and physical activity in early years education, revealing variation in stakeholders' awareness and understanding of physical activity recommendations, and highlighting barriers to implementation, including resource limitations and conflicting priorities.
References
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Matthew J. Page,Joanne E. McKenzie,Patrick M.M. Bossuyt,Isabelle Boutron,Tammy Hoffmann,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Larissa Shamseer,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Elie A. Akl,Sue E. Brennan,Roger Chou,Julie Glanville,Jeremy M. Grimshaw,Asbjørn Hróbjartsson,Manoj M. Lalu,Tianjing Li,Elizabeth Loder,Evan Mayo-Wilson,Steve McDonald,Luke A McGuinness,Lesley A. Stewart,James Thomas,Andrea C. Tricco,Vivian Welch,Penny Whiting,David Moher +25 more
TL;DR: The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement as discussed by the authors was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found.
46.2K
Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework
Hilary Arksey,Lisa O'Malley +1 more
TL;DR: A framework for conducting a scoping study is outlined based on recent experiences of reviewing the literature on services for carers for people with mental health problems and it is suggested that a wider debate is called for about the role of the scoped study in relation to other types of literature reviews.
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
Andrea C. Tricco,Erin Lillie,Wasifa Zarin,Kelly K O'Brien,Heather Colquhoun,Danielle Levac,David Moher,Micah D J Peters,Tanya Horsley,Laura Weeks,Susanne Hempel,Elie A. Akl,Christine Chang,Jessie McGowan,Lesley A. Stewart,Lisa Hartling,Adrian Aldcroft,Michael G. Wilson,Chantelle Garritty,Simon Lewin,Christina Godfrey,Marilyn Macdonald,Etienne V. Langlois,Karla Soares-Weiser,Jo Moriarty,Tammy Clifford,Özge Tunçalp,Sharon E. Straus +27 more
TL;DR: A PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was needed to provide reporting guidance for this specific type of knowledge synthesis and was developed according to published guidance by the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency of health Research) Network for the development of reporting guidelines.
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
TL;DR: The strongest features of the app, identified and reported in user feedback, were its ability to help in screening and collaboration as well as the time savings it affords to users.
International Standard Classification of Education, ISCED 1997
Scientific
- 01 Jan 2003
TL;DR: The International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) was designed by UNESCO in the early 1970s to serve as an instrument suitable for assembling, compiling and presenting statistics of education both within individual countries and internationally as discussed by the authors.
2.3K