Open AccessPosted Content
Rethinking Software Protection
6
TL;DR: This chapter starts with a short technical description of what AI is, and identifies those parts of AI applications that constitute software to which legal software protection regimes may be applicable, before outlining those protection regimes, namely copyright and patents.
read more
Abstract: The core of artificial intelligence (AI) applications is software of one sort or another. Of course, if software were a mere ingredient, we may have had AI applications already decades ago. After all, it was Allen Touring who in the 1950s developed the first test for AI and concepts surrounding it. But while available data and computing power are important for the recent quantum leap in AI, there would not be any AI without computer programs or software. Therefore, the rise in importance of AI forces us to take — once again — a closer look at software protection through intellectual property (IP) rights, but it also offers us a chance to rethink this protection, and while perhaps not undoing the mistakes of the past, to at least adapt the protection so as not to increase the dysfunctionality that we have come to see in this area of law for the past decades. To be able to establish the best possible way to protect — or not to protect — the software in AI applications, this chapter starts with a short technical description of what AI is, and readers are referred to other chapters in this book for a deeper analysis (1). It continues by identifying those parts of AI applications that constitute software to which legal software protection regimes may be applicable (2), before outlining those protection regimes, namely copyright and patents (3). The core part of the chapter analyses potential issues regarding software protection with respect to AI using specific examples from the fields of evolutionary algorithms and of machine learning (4). Finally, the chapter draws some conclusions regarding the future development of IP regimes with respect to AI (5).
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Towards a New Instrument of Protection for Software in the EU? - Learning the Lessons from the Harmonization Failure of Software Patentability
Christophe Geiger,Reto M. Hilty +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, a socio-economic analysis of the patentability of computer-implemented inventions is presented, which deals with the question of whether patent law is really the appropriate judicial instrument or if other tools (existing or to be created) must be taken into consideration.
6
European Union Law perspective on the intellectual property protection of artificial intelligence systems
D. P. Bohatchuk
TL;DR: EU law perspective on IP protection of AI systems focuses on copyright, patent and sui generis database protection. Copyright protection for AI systems is limited due to originality requirements. Patent protection for AI systems is possible but requires meeting all requirements. Sui generis database protection applicability is limited to the EU.
Inter- und Intradisziplinarität in der juristischen Forschung und Lehre
Peter R. Slowinski
- 01 Jan 2024
TaiE: Function Identification for Monolithic Firmware
Jintao Huang,Kai Yang,Gaosheng Wang,Zhiqiang Shi,Shichao Lv,Limin Sun +5 more
- 15 Apr 2024
TL;DR: Function identification in unformatted monolithic firmware images is challenging due to the lack of metadata and the presence of unformatted data structures.
References
•Posted Content
Computer Programming and the Automation of Invention: A Case for Software Patent Reform
TL;DR: This work has argued that patent law should allow software to be conceived, described, and claimed in terms of its logical structure to produce a better fit between patent law and software.
13
Towards a New Instrument of Protection for Software in the EU? - Learning the Lessons from the Harmonization Failure of Software Patentability
Christophe Geiger,Reto M. Hilty +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, a socio-economic analysis of the patentability of computer-implemented inventions is presented, which deals with the question of whether patent law is really the appropriate judicial instrument or if other tools (existing or to be created) must be taken into consideration.
6
Related Papers (5)
[...]
Tanay Chowdhury,John Oredo +1 more
- 01 Sep 2021
Madhav Sharma,David P. Biros +1 more
- 11 Jun 2021