Journal Article10.1177/172460080902400318
Research Management
Fabrizio Panozzo
- 01 Jul 2009
Vol. 24, pp 192-192
TL;DR: Best practices for research thrust leaders in an engineering research center are discussed, covering leadership, communication, and management aspects.
read more
Abstract: This chapter addresses best practices for research thrust leaders, the research team leaders who are positioned on the Engineering Research Center (ERC) organizational chart between center directors and individual faculty researchers, with responsibility for one of several “thrust” areas within the center’s overall research program. Although aimed at ERC research thrust leaders, the chapter’s content may also be of value to other members of a center’s leadership teams (e.g., directors and deputy directors, faculty, testbed leaders, and industrial partners). This section begins with background summarizing the quarter-century experience from which these best practices have emerged, followed by an explanation of the importance of research thrust leaders and the challenges they face. Perspectives on the types of best practices discussed in this chapter are then followed by a roadmap of the remaining sections.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
References
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology.
TL;DR: Powell et al. as mentioned in this paper developed a network approach to organizational learning and derive firm-level, longitudinal hypotheses that link research and development alliances, experience with managing interfirm relationships, network position, rates of growth, and portfolios of collaborative activities.
9.1K
Technological Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The Use of Organizational Control in Managing Research and Development
TL;DR: In this paper, the influence of organizational controls on the research and development activities of R&D professionals was investigated in a sample of 57 pharmaceutical firms, and the results showed that input, behavior, and output control enhanced radical innovation, and input and output controls enhanced incremental innovation.
955
Knowledge Work: Ambiguity, Image and Identity
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors take a sceptical view of the functionalist understanding of the nature and significance of knowledge in so-called knowledge intensive companies and emphasize the slipperiness of the concept of knowledge, the ambiguity of knowledge and its role in what is constructed as knowledge work and the evaluation of work outcomes.
951
Management of project knowledge and experiences
TL;DR: Organizing by projects is on a strong increase, because projects are accepted to be learning intensive organizational forms, but the boundaries between projects and the permanent organization are strong barriers for knowledge and experiences gained in projects.
248
Tacit Networks, Heterogeneous Engineers, and Embodied Technology:
Knut Holtan Sørensen,Nora Levold +1 more
TL;DR: The transfer of concepts and methods from social studies of science to technology studies has conserved this lack of concern with the meso level as mentioned in this paper, which has led to a neglect of institutions and institutional arrangements, which are important to the student of technology.
99