Proceedings Article10.35199/epde.2023.45
Reorienting design thinking through systems thinking
Malene Pilgaard Harsaae,Martin Storkholm Nielsen,Tom Østergaard,Anne Louise Bang +3 more
1
TL;DR: Reorienting design thinking through systems thinking reorients the process to include nature, non-human and humane elements, emphasizing natural recovery and green transition.
read more
Abstract: In this paper, we discuss how systems thinking can serve as an entry point to a re-oriented design thinking process model where equal value is attached to nature, the non-human and the humane. Design thinking matured at a time (mid 90s - 00s) when climate and environment did not receive the same attention as in recent years. We believe that design thinking still has its justification as a process tool. However, we want to discuss if design thinking as a process tool can be strengthened if we supplement the process with a consistent focus on ecosystems and systems thinking. In this paper, we specifically address and discuss the role of systems thinking and systems mapping as perspectives to reorient the design thinking process in the 2020s where natural recovery and green transition should have the highest priority as a result of the general state of the planet. In two projects, a module course for innovation and entrepreneurship and an international co-curricular project on systems mapping, we have employed systems thinking at different phases in the design thinking process. In this paper, we evaluate in which ways and to what extent systems thinking has contributed to the learning process. We exemplify and argue how students have obtained a deeper understanding of the complexity of ‘wicked problems’ and the mechanisms causing them. In conclusion, we point to a potential for reorienting the design thinking process by combining it with systems thinking and approaching it as a continuous movement between ontological and operational perspectives.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Collective intelligence for fighting food waste: changing the way things are done with participatory design
Linda Brennan,David Micallef,Eva L. Jenkins,Lukas Parker,Natalia Alessi +4 more
TL;DR: The study explores the use of collective intelligence for fighting food waste through participatory design, engaging industry participants in understanding and responding to consumers’ perceptions of the role of packaging in reducing food waste.
2
References
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
TL;DR: The search for scientific bases for confronting problems of social policy is bound to fail, becuase of the nature of these problems as discussed by the authors, whereas science has developed to deal with tame problems.
Wicked Problems in Design Thinking
TL;DR: The first French university symposium on design research was held in 1990 at l'Universit6 de Technologie de Compiegne, this paper, with the theme of "Colloque Recherches sur le Design: Incitations, Implications, Interactions".
3.7K
Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System
David Reider,Principal Partner +1 more
- 01 Jan 2012
TL;DR: Leverage points are points of power, and the authors not only want to believe that there are leverage points, they want to know where they are and how to get their hands on them.
1.8K
Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore the evolution of Design for Sustainability (DfS) and propose an evolutionary framework and map the reviewed DfS approaches onto this framework, showing how it progressively expanded from a technical and product-centric focus towards large scale system level changes in which sustainability is understood as a socio-technical challenge.
814
Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the design thinking practice of world leading design and innovation firm IDEO, and the application of these principles to successful design education at prestigious d.school, the Institute of Design at Stanford University, and not least with the publication of Change by Design.
744