Open Access
Relations on computable structures
Valentina S. Harizanov
- 01 Jan 2001
TL;DR: Gődel's incompleteness theorem from 1931 is an astonishing early result of computable mathematics as discussed by the authors, which established the rigorous mathematical foundations for the computability theory, and showed that there are problems in the theory of ordinary whole numbers which cannot be decided from the axioms.
read more
Abstract: Gődel’s incompleteness theorem from 1931 is an astonishing early result of computable mathematics. Gődel showed that “there are in fact relatively simple problems in the theory of ordinary whole numbers which cannot be decided from the axioms.” The work of Gődel, Turing, Kleene, Church, Post and others in the mid-1930’s established the rigorous mathematical foundations for the computability theory. However, even in 1930, van der Waerden in his Moderne Algebra I introduced an explicitly given field as one “whose elements are uniquely represented by distinguishable symbols with which addition, subtraction, multiplication and division can be performed in a finite number of operations.” He showed that if a field is given explicitly, then every simple extension of that field is also given explicitly. In his pioneering paper on non-factorability of polynomials from 1930, van der Waerden essentially proved that an explicit field (F,+, ·) does not necessarily have an algorithm for splitting polynomials in F [x] into their irreducible factors. In the 1950’s, Frohlich and Shepherdson used the precise notion of a computable function to obtain a collection of results and examples about explicit rings and fields. Several years later, Rabin and Mal’tsev did an extensive investigation of computable groups and other computable (recursive, constructive) algebras. In the 1970’s, Metakides and Nerode initiated a systematic study of computability in mathematical structures and constructions by using modern computability-theoretic tools, such as the priority method. Computable mathematics explores the algorithmic content (effectiveness) of notions, constructions and theorems in classical mathematics. It starts by defining effective analogues of classical concepts in algebra and model theory. If we begin with structures, and effectivize the notion of a structure, we arrive at the notion of a computable structure. An algebraic
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Computability of Fraïssé limits
TL;DR: It is proved that the computable atomless Boolean algebra is spectrally universal, which means that degree spectra of relations on a sufficiently nice Fraïssé limit are always upward closed unless the relation is definable by a quantifier-free formula.
15
Spaces of orders and their Turing degree spectra
TL;DR: This work investigates computability theoretic and topological properties of spaces of orders on computable orderable groups for which the spaces of left orders are homeomorphic to the Cantor set, and their Turing degree spectra contain certain upper cones of degrees.
10
Π10 classes and strong degree spectra of relations
John Chisholm,Jennifer Chubb,Valentina S. Harizanov,Denise R. Hirschfeldt,Carl G. Jockusch,Timothy H. McNicholl,Sarah Pingrey +6 more
TL;DR: It is shown that there is a low c.e. set that is not weak truth-table reducible to any initial segment of any scattered computable linear ordering.
Spectra of structures and relations
TL;DR: The computable dense linear order ℒ is universal for all countable linear orders under this notion of embedding, and the first known example of a structure whose spectrum contains precisely those degrees c with c′ ≥ τ 0″ is built.
References
Recursive labelling systems and stability of recursive structures in hyperarithmetical degrees
TL;DR: It is shown that, under certain assumptions of recursiveness in 2t, the recursive structure 2t is AO-stable for ca w, and an analogous result [Proposition 2] is frame for (-yn)-systems where (-yn) is an increasing sequence of ordinals.
Hierarchies of sets and degrees below 0
Richard L. Epstein,Richard L. Epstein,Richard H. Haas,Richard H. Haas,Richard L. Kramer,Richard L. Kramer +5 more
- 01 Jan 1981
TL;DR: This work examines two hierarchies of sets below 0' based on the number of changes a recursive approximation to a set needs to make, and relates these hierarchies to the degrees of unsolvability i 0'.
77
Computable isomorphisms, degree spectra of relations, and Scott families
TL;DR: It is proved that any computable partially ordered set is isomorphic to the spectrum of an intrinsically c.e. relation on a computable structure, and the isomorphism can be constructed in such a way that the image of the minimum element of the partially ordering set is computable.
41
Some effects of Ash-Nerode and other decidability conditions on degree spectra
TL;DR: It is shown that, while a recursive non-intrinsically r.e. relation which satisfies the Ash–Nerode decidability condition has an infinite degree spectrum.
40
Intrinsically gs;0alpha; relations
TL;DR: A direct (infinite injury) construction for the case α = 2 is given, together with several examples, which demonstrate that the decidability conditions required are satisfiable in natural examples.
30