Journal Article10.3390/fi15110359
Reinforcement Learning vs. Computational Intelligence: Comparing Service Management Approaches for the Cloud Continuum
7
TL;DR: This paper makes a comparison of different optimization algorithms and a first investigation of how they can perform in this kind of scenario and demonstrates how all approaches can solve the service management problem with similar performance—with a different sample efficiency—if a high number of samples can be evaluated for training and optimization.
read more
Abstract: Modern computing environments, thanks to the advent of enabling technologies such as Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC), effectively represent a Cloud Continuum, a capillary network of computing resources that extend from the Edge of the network to the Cloud, which enables a dynamic and adaptive service fabric. Efficiently coordinating resource allocation, exploitation, and management in the Cloud Continuum represents quite a challenge, which has stimulated researchers to investigate innovative solutions based on smart techniques such as Reinforcement Learning and Computational Intelligence. In this paper, we make a comparison of different optimization algorithms and a first investigation of how they can perform in this kind of scenario. Specifically, this comparison included the Deep Q-Network, Proximal Policy Optimization, Genetic Algorithms, Particle Swarm Optimization, Quantum-inspired Particle Swarm Optimization, Multi-Swarm Particle Optimization, and the Grey-Wolf Optimizer. We demonstrate how all approaches can solve the service management problem with similar performance—with a different sample efficiency—if a high number of samples can be evaluated for training and optimization. Finally, we show that, if the scenario conditions change, Deep-Reinforcement-Learning-based approaches can exploit the experience built during training to adapt service allocation according to the modified conditions.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Edge and Fog Computing for the Internet of Things
TL;DR: The growth of IoT devices has led to a significant increase in data collection and processing needs, prompting the need for distributed computing solutions like edge and fog computing.
1
Hybrid Metaheuristic Algorithms for Resource Allocation in Fog Computing Environments
Pranav Kumar,Harpreet S. Bhatia,Anurag Shrivastava,Kanchan Yadav,Manish Saraswat,Deepa Bisht +5 more
- 21 Feb 2024
1
A Hybrid Deep Reinforcement and Swarm Optimization Strategy for Intelligent Cloud Service Composition
V N V L S Swathi,Bandi Rambabu,Mallareddy Adudhodla,M. Archana,K. Deepthi Reddy +4 more
- 03 Sep 2025
TL;DR: This study proposes a hybrid DRL-PSO framework for intelligent cloud service composition, outperforming state-of-the-art meta-heuristics by 12.5% in QoS utility, 18.3% in execution time, and 9.7% in service success rate, demonstrating scalability and robustness in dynamic cloud environments.
The Evolution of Kubernetes Management: Introducing the KubeTwin Framework
Mattia Zaccarini,Mauro Tortonesi,Filippo Poltronieri +2 more
- 06 May 2024
TL;DR: The KubeTwin framework is introduced, a Digital Twin-based solution to evaluate the behavior and the impact of Kubernetes applications in a shorter computation time, and provides a plethora of functionalities that can help providers to assess their ecosystems by employing different mechanisms that span from performance optimization to chaos engineering.
VOICE: Value-of-Information for Compute Continuum Ecosystems
Mattia Zaccarini,Benedetta Cantelli,Maria Fazio,William Fornaciari,Filippo Poltronieri,Cesare Stefanelli,Mauro Tortonesi +6 more
- 11 Mar 2024
TL;DR: It is argued that CC environments call for novel resource management strategies with a holistic perspective of the whole computing ecosystem, that also consider the QoS reconfiguration and tuning of services in the resource reallocation process.
References
Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning
Volodymyr Mnih,Koray Kavukcuoglu,David Silver,Andrei Rusu,Joel Veness,Marc G. Bellemare,Alex Graves,Martin Riedmiller,Andreas K. Fidjeland,Georg Ostrovski,Stig Petersen,Charles Beattie,Amir Sadik,Ioannis Antonoglou,Helen King,Dharshan Kumaran,Daan Wierstra,Shane Legg,Demis Hassabis +18 more
TL;DR: This work bridges the divide between high-dimensional sensory inputs and actions, resulting in the first artificial agent that is capable of learning to excel at a diverse array of challenging tasks.
Grey Wolf Optimizer
TL;DR: The results of the classical engineering design problems and real application prove that the proposed GWO algorithm is applicable to challenging problems with unknown search spaces.
15K
Technical Note : \cal Q -Learning
Chris Watkins,Peter Dayan +1 more
TL;DR: This paper presents and proves in detail a convergence theorem forQ-learning based on that outlined in Watkins (1989), showing that Q-learning converges to the optimum action-values with probability 1 so long as all actions are repeatedly sampled in all states and the action- values are represented discretely.
A review on genetic algorithm: past, present, and future
TL;DR: The analysis of recent advances in genetic algorithms is discussed and the well-known algorithms and their implementation are presented with their pros and cons with the aim of facilitating new researchers.
Self-organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimizer with time-varying acceleration coefficients
TL;DR: A novel parameter automation strategy for the particle swarm algorithm and two further extensions to improve its performance after a predefined number of generations to overcome the difficulties of selecting an appropriate mutation step size for different problems.
3.1K