Proceedings Article10.1109/ACSSC.2006.354865
Registration of DCE MR Images for Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Breast Cancer
Qiu Wu,Gary J. Whitman,Donald S. Fussell,Mia K. Markey +3 more
- 01 Dec 2006
- pp 826-830
7
TL;DR: A registration scheme that employs an elastic model as the deformation model and normalized cross correlation as the similarity term is presented and results indicate that a local similarity metric such as normalizedCross correlation can achieve desirable registration performance.
read more
Abstract: The kinetic features of lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) breast MRI provide important diagnostic information. However, the same coordinates in raw DCE breast MR images at different times in the series may correspond to different physical locations in the subject due to respiratory motion, cardiac motion, and patient movements during image acquisition. In order to extract accurate kinetic features, an image registration step is necessary to spatially align the voxels across sequentially collected breast MR image volumes to ensure accurate time curve signal representation at each spatial location of the lesion. The challenges in registering DCE breast MR images are that the breasts undergo non-rigid motion and that the image intensity changes over time. This paper presents a registration scheme that employs an elastic model as the deformation model and normalized cross correlation as the similarity term. Symmetric consistency is used to evaluate the registration algorithm. Our results indicate that a local similarity metric such as normalized cross correlation can achieve desirable registration performance.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Automated registration of sequential breath-hold dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: a comparison of three techniques.
Sivaramakrishnan Rajaraman,Jeffrey J. Rodriguez,Christian G. Graff,Maria I. Altbach,Tomislav Dragovich,Claude B. Sirlin,Ronald L. Korn,Natarajan Raghunand +7 more
TL;DR: A computer-generated DCE-MRI phantom is employed to compare the performance of two published methods, Progressive Principal Component Registration and Pharmacokinetic Model-Driven Registration, with Sequential Elastic Registration (SER) to register adjacent time-sample images using a published general-purpose elastic registration algorithm.
21
Learning Multiparametric Biomarkers for Assessing MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound Treatment of Malignant Tumors
Blake E. Zimmerman,Sara L. Johnson,Henrik Odéen,Jill E. Shea,Markus D. Foote,Nicole Winkler,Sarang Joshi,Allison Payne +7 more
TL;DR: In this paper, a deep convolutional neural network was trained on non-contrast multiparametric MR images using the nonperfused volume (NPV) biomarker from follow-up MR imaging (3-5 days after MRgFUS treatment) as the accurate label of nonviable tissue.
6
•Posted Content
Learning Multiparametric Biomarkers for Assessing MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound Treatments Using Volume-Conserving Registration.
Blake E. Zimmerman,Blake E. Zimmerman,Sara L. Johnson,Henrik Odéen,Jill E. Shea,Markus D. Foote,Markus D. Foote,Nicole Winkler,Sarang Joshi,Sarang Joshi,Allison Payne +10 more
TL;DR: A novel, noncontrast, learned multiparametric MR biomarker that can be used during treatment for intratreatment assessment, validated in a VX2 rabbit tumor model is presented.
3
Histology to 3D in vivo MR registration for volumetric evaluation of MRgFUS treatment assessment biomarkers.
Blake E. Zimmerman,Blake E. Zimmerman,Sara L. Johnson,Henrik Odéen,Jill E. Shea,Rachel E. Factor,Sarang Joshi,Sarang Joshi,Allison Payne +8 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a registration pipeline for MRgFUS-guided focused ultrasound (MRI-FUS) applications in anatomies such as liver, kidney, or breast, which utilizes intermediate imaging and does not rely on anatomical MR features being visible in histology.
•Posted Content
Histology to 3D In Vivo MR Registration for Volumetric Evaluation of MRgFUS Treatment Assessment Biomarkers
Blake E. Zimmerman,Sara L. Johnson,Henrik Odéen,Jill E. Shea,Rachel E. Factor,Sarang Joshi,Sarang Joshi,Allison Payne +7 more
TL;DR: A novel MR to histology registration workflow that utilizes intermediate imaging and does not rely on anatomical features independent from treatment features to perform direct registration, and will facilitate validating novel MRgFUS biomarkers to improve treatment assessment without surgical intervention.
2
References
Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images
TL;DR: The results clearly indicate that the proposed nonrigid registration algorithm is much better able to recover the motion and deformation of the breast than rigid or affine registration algorithms.
Medical image registration
TL;DR: Applications of image registration include combining images of the same subject from different modalities, aligning temporal sequences of images to compensate for motion of the subject between scans, image guidance during interventions and aligning images from multiple subjects in cohort studies.
Multiresolution elastic matching
Ruzena Bajcsy,Stane Kovacic +1 more
TL;DR: Results show that all normal brains, at least at a certain level of representation, have the same topological structure, but may differ in shape details, and the matching process can account for these differences.
1.3K
Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
TL;DR: The goal was to critically appraise and synthesize evidence about the overall effectiveness of breast cancer screening, as well as its effectiveness among women younger than 50 years of age, and to evaluate previous meta-analyses of these trials and of screening test characteristics and studies evaluating the harms associated with false-positive test results.
1.2K
Optimal registration of deformed images
Chaim Broit
- 01 Jan 1981
TL;DR: In this paper, an optimal registration method for matching two and three dimensional deformed images has been developed, where the deformation part of the cost function is measured by the strain energy of the deformed image and the mapping obtained by the registration process is optimal with respect to this cost function.
416