1. What are the future works mentioned in the paper "Reflexive intermediate first-order logics" ?
But enough machinery has been developed to easily extend this to answer questions about what the metatheory from one first-order logic can say about a different first-order logic.. ( 2 ) ⇒ ( 1 ) Assuming that ∃L2 ∈ IFO ( Meta ( L1 ) ` Cpl ( L2 ) ), the authors can rewrite this as Meta ( L1 ) ` ∀0 ( 0 0L2 ⊥ → ∃A. A 0 ). Because Meta ( L1 ) is aware of the inclusion L2 ⊆ Cl, they also have Meta ( L1 ) ` ∀0 ( 0 0Cl ⊥ → 0 0L2 ⊥ ).
read more
2. What are the contributions mentioned in the paper "Reflexive intermediate first-order logics" ?
This paper classifies reflexive intermediate logics in the first-order case: a firstorder logic is reflexive if and only if it proves every instance of the principle of double negation shift and the metatheory created from it proves every instance of the principle of testability.
read more