Reducing structural-element salience on a source problem produces later success in analogical transfer: what role does source difficulty play?
André Didierjean,Sandra Nogry +1 more
TL;DR: Two experiments in reasoning by analogy were conducted to study the role of inducing source difficulty by reducing the salience of the source’s structural elements, showing that subjects given a difficult source were better at categorizing isomorphic problems on the basis of structural features than were subjects given an easy source.
read more
Abstract: Two experiments in reasoning by analogy were conducted to study the role of inducing source difficulty by reducing the salience of the source’s structural elements. Three nonexclusive hypotheses were tested. According to the first, a difficult source problem improves analogical transfer because it increases the probability that the subject will notice the similarity between the source and the target. For example, errors made on both the source and the target can enhance the subject’s awareness of the similarity between the two problems. According to the second hypothesis, a source that is difficult to solve is memorized better than an easier source. According to the third, source-problem difficulty affects the degree of abstractness in the representation of the solution elaborated by subjects. Experiment 1 showed that the higher frequency of spontaneous transfer between the source and the target when the source problem was difficult (Gick & McGarry, 1992) could be replicated in a cued-transfer situation. Experiment 2 showed that subjects given a difficult source, one in which the important element was not very salient, were better at categorizing isomorphic problems on the basis of structural features than were subjects given an easy source. The discussion deals with the implications of these results for the hypotheses tested and, more generally, for reasoning by analogy and education in general.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
The Import of Knowledge Export: Connecting Findings and Theories of Transfer of Learning
TL;DR: This article reviewed and discussed many of the more important ideas and findings from the existing research and attempt to bridge this body of work with the exciting new research directions suggested by the following articles.
284
Connecting Long Distance: Semantic Distance in Analogical Reasoning Modulates Frontopolar Cortex Activity
Adam E. Green,David J. M. Kraemer,David J. M. Kraemer,Jonathan A. Fugelsang,Jeremy R. Gray,Kevin Dunbar +5 more
TL;DR: FMRI data represent a first empirical characterization of how the brain mediates semantically distant analogical mapping, in which brain activity was measured during an analogical reasoning task, and semantic distance was derived quantitatively from latent semantic analysis.
How Did We Get from There to Here? An Evolutionary Perspective on Embodied Cognition
Margaret Wilson
- 01 Jan 2008
TL;DR: The embodied cognition perspective is fundamentally an evolutionary one, viewing cognition as a set of abilities that built upon, and still reflects, the structure of our physical bodies and how our brains evolved to manage those bodies as mentioned in this paper. But the embodied cognition literature has sometimes taken a very strong stance that cognition is fundamentally and directly bound to the body in its immediate physical environment.
33
Multiple paths to transfer and constraint relaxation in insight problem solving
TL;DR: This paper found that alleviating multiple constraints was more effective than the alleviation of single constraints via training programmes, while providing single difficulty hints was ineffective in promoting solution. But, while both training methods were effective, the alleviating of multiple constraints in the Four-Tree problem was more helpful than alleviating single constraints.
31
References
Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning
TL;DR: It is suggested that a major reason for the ineffectiveness of problem solving as a learning device, is that the cognitive processes required by the two activities overlap insufficiently, and that conventional problem solving in the form of means-ends analysis requires a relatively large amount of cognitive processing capacity which is consequently unavailable for schema acquisition.
7.1K
Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices
TL;DR: Results from sorting tasks and protocols reveal that experts and novices begin their problem representations with specifiably different problem categories, and completion of the representations depends on the knowledge associated with the categories.
5.5K
Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design
TL;DR: In this article, it is suggested that when considering intellectual activities, schema acquisition and automation are the primary mechanisms of learning and that extraneous cognitive load that interferes with learning only is a problem under conditions of high cognitive load caused by high element interactivity.
3.4K
Schema induction and analogical transfer
Mary L. Gick,Keith J. Holyoak +1 more
TL;DR: This paper showed that if two prior analogs were given, subjects often derived a problem schema as an incidental product of describing the similarities of the analogs, and the quality of the induced schema was highly predictive of subsequent transfer performance.
2.9K
Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction
Paul Chandler,John Sweller +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the consequences of split-source and integrated information using electrical engineering and biology instructional materials were evaluated in an industrial training setting, and the results indicated that the materials chosen were unintelligible without mental integration.