Journal Article10.1002/wics.92
Ranked set sampling
D. Wolfe
- 01 Jul 2010
Vol. 2
9
TL;DR: Ranked set sampling (RSS) is a sampling design that provides more structure to the data collection process and decreases the likelihood of obtaining an unrepresentative sample while minimizing the number of measured observations.
read more
Abstract: The most common sampling approach for collecting data from a population with the goal of making inferences about unknown features of the population is a simple random sample (SRS). There is a probabilistic guarantee that each measured observation in an SRS can be considered representative of the population. Despite this assurance, there remains a distinct possibility that a specific SRS might not provide a truly representative picture of the population. With that in mind, statisticians have developed a variety of ways to guard against obtaining such unrepresentative samples. Sampling designs such as stratified sampling, probability sampling, and cluster sampling all provide additional structure on the sampling process to improve the likelihood that the collected sample data do, indeed, provide a good representation of the population. A secondary goal in most data collection settings is to minimize the costs associated with obtaining the data. Ranked set sampling (RSS) is a relatively recent development that addresses both of these issues. It uses additional information from the population to provide more structure to the data collection process and decreases the likelihood of an unrepresentative sample. In addition, it is designed to minimize the number of measured observations required to achieve the desired precision in making inferences. In this article, we provide a general introduction to both balanced and unbalanced RSS, describing the basic approaches for collecting each type of RSS and some of the associated properties. We discuss a number of important factors that affect the performance of RSS procedures. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
read more
Chat with Paper
AI Agents for this Paper
Find similar papers on Google Scholar, PubMed and Arxiv
Write a critical review of this paper
Analyze citations of this paper to find unaddressed research gaps
Citations
Using landscape structure to develop quantitative baselines for protected area monitoring
Paola Mairota,Barbara Cafarelli,Luigi Boccaccio,Vincenzo Leronni,Rocco Labadessa,Vasiliki Kosmidou,Harini Nagendra +6 more
TL;DR: The framework developed has significant potential to capture information on major landscape structural features, identify problematic areas of increased fragmentation that can be used to prioritise research, monitoring and intervention, and provide early warning signals for immediate response to pressures increasing habitat fragmentation.
95
Most powerful rank tests for perfect rankings
Jesse Frey,Le Wang +1 more
TL;DR: It is found that the best of the existing tests is the test that rejects when the null probability of the observed ranks is small, and a new, more efficient R function is provided for computing the test statistic.
24
Maximum likelihood estimator of the parameter for a continuous one-parameter exponential family under the optimal ranked set sampling
Wangxue Chen,Yi Tian,Minyu Xie +2 more
TL;DR: A maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) of the parameter for a continuous one-parameter exponential family under ranked set sampling (RSS) is studied and the existence and uniqueness of the MLEs of the parameters for some usual distributions in this family are proved.
19
Estimating asymptotic variance of M-estimators in ranked set sampling
M. Mahdizadeh,Ehsan Zamanzade +1 more
TL;DR: Two consistent estimators for M-estimator for symmetric location families in ranked set sampling are developed and Monte Carlo simulations are employed to assess performance of the intervals.
6
On the uncertainty quantification of the active uterine contraction during the second stage of labor simulation.
Trieu-Nhat-Thanh Nguyen,A. Ballit,Pauline Lecomte-Grosbras,Jean-Baptiste Colliat,Tien-Tuan Dao +4 more
1
References
Ranked Set Sampling Theory with Order Statistics Background
T. R. Dell,J. L. Clutter +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors reviewed the importance of errors in judgment ordering in the ranked set sampling method and compared it to random sampling and the average of the mean of a set of elements.
727
Ranked Set Sampling: An Approach to More Efficient Data Collection
TL;DR: In this paper, the structural differences between ranked set samples and simple random samples are discussed, and properties of a ranked set sample analog of the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon statistic are presented.
An investigation into the use of ranked set sampling on grass and grass-clover swards
TL;DR: There should be worthwhile improvement in precision over random sampling, provided that the quadrats within a set are as well spaced as possible, allowing, if necessary, for visual comparison.
89
Nonparametric Two-Sample Methods for Ranked-Set Sample Data
TL;DR: In this paper, a new collection of procedures for the analysis of two-sample, ranked-set samples, providing an alternative to the Bohn-Wolfe procedure, was developed.
67